Americans like science, but don't understand it

  • Thread starter Thread starter mgb_phys
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Science
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the disconnect between American public perception of science and their actual understanding of scientific concepts. Participants highlight that while Americans generally appreciate the benefits of science, there is a significant gap in scientific literacy, particularly regarding topics like global warming and evolution. The conversation emphasizes the need for a cultural shift towards valuing scientific education and literacy to ensure societal progress and address misconceptions. The importance of understanding the scientific method and basic scientific principles is deemed essential for the future of society.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic scientific concepts such as evolution and climate change.
  • Familiarity with the scientific method and its application in everyday life.
  • Awareness of the role of science in societal progress and technological advancement.
  • Knowledge of public perceptions of science and its implications for education.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of scientific literacy on societal development and policy-making.
  • Explore educational strategies to improve public understanding of science.
  • Investigate global comparisons of scientific literacy and public perception of science.
  • Examine case studies on the effects of misinformation in scientific topics like vaccines and climate change.
USEFUL FOR

Educators, policymakers, science communicators, and anyone interested in improving public understanding of science and its relevance to societal issues.

  • #31
Arthur Benjamin makes interesting points about basic mathematics that should be taught in high schools, but isn't, here:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Pythagorean said:
If it were one or the other, I'd prefer the company of socially intelligent people to scientifically intelligent ones. You can be good at math and have a good foundation in science, but it doesn't justify treating people like dirt, especially for having a different taste in knowledge than you.

Also, if you want to be able to survive independent of mainstream society, indigenous knowledge far outweighs scientific knowledge.

You appear to be suggesting that scientific intelligence and social capabilities are exclusive; they are not, and it should not be expected to be so.
 
  • #33
Chi Meson said:
You appear to be suggesting that scientific intelligence and social capabilities are exclusive; they are not, and it should not be expected to be so.

I) Some people can be scientific intelligent but socially incapable.
II) Some people can be socially intelligent but have no scientific intelligence.
III) Some people are both scientifically and socially intelligent but not all people fall into this category.

Pythagorean is only talking about I or II which do exist.
 
  • #34
rootX said:
I) Some people can be scientific intelligent but socially incapable.
II) Some people can be socially intelligent but have no scientific intelligence.
III) Some people are both scientifically and socially intelligent but not all people fall into this category.
Of course they don't. In fact very few people fall into any clear-cut category at all, including I and II in the above table.

As to Pythagoras' post, I think there was an implied reference within it that I didn't pick up on the first read.
 
  • #35
Chi Meson said:
Of course they don't. In fact very few people fall into any clear-cut category at all, including I and II in the above table.

As to Pythagoras' post, I think there was an implied reference within it that I didn't pick up on the first read.

I didn't mean to imply that everyone was one or the other. I was just saying that given a choice between the two extreme situations, I would prefer the more socially intelligent company.

I definitely don't mean to spread the stereotype that all scientists are socially inept. Also, I don't really mean to cut on that kind of social inadequacy. The scientist stereotype often refers to nervous and awkward. This may not mark a social elite, but they're eons ahead of crass and pretentious (which is what I was mostly referring to).
 
  • #36
Some might find the following to be quite surprising.

Art Hobson, in a letter published the July 2008 issue of The American Journal of Physics, writes:

"Fortunately, the U.S. system of higher education allows us a perfect opportunity to do this. Our system requires most college students to take a variety of general education courses in history, language, literature, the arts, and the sciences. All European nations, and most other nations, have no such general education requirements for college students. U.S. adults have scored far higher than European adults during two decades of tests of general scientific literacy by Jon D. Miller,2 Director of the International Center for Scientific Literacy at Michigan State University. Miller has shown that the U.S. required college science courses for nonscientists are almost certainly the reason for this unexpected result, and that these courses are surprisingly effective at instilling lifelong scientific literacy.3 As Miller puts it, “What we are seeing here is a result of the fact that Americans are required to take science courses at the university, while Europeans and Asians are not.

2 For an overview of Miller’s program of scientific literacy measurements and analysis, see J. Trefil, Why Science? Teacher’s College Press, New York, 2008, Chap. 6.

3 A. Hobson, “The surprising effectiveness of college scientific literacy courses,” submitted for publication to The Physics Teacher, preprint available at physics.uark.edu/hobson/ pubs/08.01.TPT.html."
 
  • #37
Off topic posts deleted, the thread is closed.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K