Ampére's Law Cylindrical Conductor with Hole

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on applying Ampère's Law to determine the magnetic field inside a cylindrical hole of a conducting rod carrying a uniform current I. The derived magnetic field in the hole is given by the formula B = (μ₀ dI) / (2π(R² - a²)). The solution involves superposing two current distributions: one with current density j and another with current density -j, representing the hole. The participants emphasize the importance of using both the integral and differential forms of Ampère's Law to arrive at the correct vector representation of the magnetic field.

PREREQUISITES
  • Ampère's Law (integral and differential forms)
  • Cylindrical coordinates and their application in electromagnetism
  • Understanding of current density and its implications in magnetic fields
  • Biot-Savart Law for magnetic field direction determination
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Ampère's Law in different geometries, particularly cylindrical conductors
  • Learn about the Biot-Savart Law and its relationship with Ampère's Law
  • Explore the concept of current density in various materials and its effect on magnetic fields
  • Investigate the superposition principle in electromagnetism for complex current configurations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, electrical engineers, and anyone involved in analyzing magnetic fields in conductive materials.

Frinkz
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A long circular rod of radius R, made of conducting material, has a cylindrical hole of radius a bored parallel to its axis and displaced from the centre of the rod by a distance d. The rod carries a current I distributed uniformly over its cross-section.

Consider the superposition of two currents flowing in opposite directions, and hence show that the magnetic field in the hole is uniform and equal to:

B = \frac{ \mu_{0} dI }{2 \pi (R^{2} - a^{2})}

Hint:
Consider the rod with a hole to be a superposition of two rods without holes: one with current density j and one with current density -j (the latter representing the hole)

Deduce from Ampére's law that:
\mathbf{B}(\mathbf{r})=\frac{1}{2} \mu_{0}(\mathbf{j} \times \mathbf{r})
for each current, where j is the current density, r is the vector from centre of the rod.


Homework Equations


Ampéres law (integral form):
\oint_ L \mathbf{B} \cdot d\mathbf{L} = \mu_{0} I

(differential form)
\mathbf{\nabla} \times \mathbf{B} = \mu_{0} \mathbf{j}

The Attempt at a Solution


Using cylindrical polars, I worked through for the integral form of Ampere's law for the first rod (j, radius R) and got:
B = \frac{\mu_{0}}{2} j
I think that's right, and it seems to be along the lines of what I should get. Except, it's a scalar, but what I'm given in the hints is vector.

Also, given that r is the vector from the centre of the rod to axis is going to be zero for the first rod, doesn't j x 0 give zero?

But if I try the differential form I end up with zero after the first step, I think this isn't the way to do it?

So I'm a bit stuck, any hints would be appreciated :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Frinkz said:
Using cylindrical polars, I worked through for the integral form of Ampere's law for the first rod (j, radius R) and got:
B = \frac{\mu_{0}}{2} j

You can guess the direction of the field at each point from the Biot-Savart law (all the dl \times r bits add up).

When you apply Ampere's law, you'll need to draw a loop so that you can evaluate the line integral, as well as calculating the current which is enclosed by that loop. You'll be able to evaluate the magnitutde of B this way for the rod with +I and the rod with -I. Since you've used \oint_ L \mathbf{B} \cdot d\mathbf{L} as 2 \pi r B in your calculation, you've already figured out the direction of B.

Note that the two wires of current +I and -I will have different current densities as their areas are different. Finally, find the vector sum of the magnetic field due to the contribution of the two rods to get your final magnetic field in the empty region.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
814
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K