Amplitude moving through detectors

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Swamp Thing
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Amplitude Detectors
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the quantum mechanics of a photon state passing through two thin parallel detectors, each with a 10% detection probability. The proposed final state representation is analyzed, revealing that there are three distinct possible outcomes: detection by detector #1, detection by detector #2, or no detection. The complexity arises from the need to account for the non-detection of one detector affecting the other, indicating that a single wave function cannot encapsulate all scenarios without incorporating the detectors as quantum entities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum mechanics fundamentals
  • Understanding of photon states and detection probabilities
  • Familiarity with quantum state representation (kets)
  • Basic knowledge of entanglement and measurement in quantum systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study quantum measurement theory and its implications on state collapse
  • Explore the concept of entanglement and its role in multi-particle systems
  • Learn about the mathematical formalism of quantum states and operators
  • Investigate advanced topics in quantum optics, particularly photon detection mechanisms
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers in quantum optics who are interested in photon detection and state representation in multi-detector systems.

Swamp Thing
Insights Author
Messages
1,048
Reaction score
799
We have two thin parallel detectors, and a ##|1\rangle## photon state passes through them. Each detector has a 10% chance of catching the photon. How can I write the final state?

I'm thinking something like ##\sqrt{0.1}|1_A\rangle |0_B\rangle |0\rangle+\sqrt{0.09}e^{-j\theta_1}|0_A\rangle |1_B\rangle |0\rangle + \sqrt{0.81}e^{-j\theta_2}|0_A\rangle |0_B\rangle a^{\dagger}a ##

Is this correct? (If not, what is the correct way?)

About the phases ##\theta_1## and ##\theta_2## , would they be the same as if the medium was lossless? To keep it simple, let's say the speed of light in the lossy medium is the same as vacuum.

But even if it is technically OK, it means that I have set the coefficients by hand, based on what I expect to see. Can it be written so that one puts in only 0.1 and the rest comes out from "shut up and calculate"? I mean, this is a toy problem, but how do we "automate" more complex stuff?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Swamp Thing said:
How can I write the final state?

You can't, because there isn't a single "final state". There are three possible "final states": detector #1 detects a photon, detector #2 detects a photon, or neither detector detects a photon. And each one only happens if the ones before it do not (e.g., if detector #1 detects a photon, there is no possibility of detector #2 detecting one). There is no way to write down a single "state" (i.e., wave function/linear combination of kets) that covers all of these possibilities (unless you want to include the detectors as quantum objects and add their states and their entanglement with the photon).
 
Thank you, I found that really useful.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K