An anaerobic denitrification question

  • Thread starter Thread starter skyshrimp
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the role of beneficial bacteria in filtration systems, particularly in relation to aerobic and anaerobic conditions. The article suggests that while aerobic bacteria effectively convert ammonia to nitrate, anaerobic bacteria can thrive in poorly maintained filters, using nitrate as a source of oxygen and converting it back to ammonia. This process is seen as counterproductive, as it undermines the work of aerobic bacteria. Participants clarify that denitrifying bacteria typically convert nitrate (NO3) to nitrogen gas (N2) through a series of steps, including the production of nitrous oxide (N2O), and emphasize that a dirty filter can lead to ammonia production from the breakdown of detritus. The conversation highlights the importance of maintaining clean biological media to ensure efficient filtration and prevent the reversal of beneficial processes.
skyshrimp
Messages
39
Reaction score
111
https://www.mankysanke.co.uk/html/anoxic_filtration.html

This paragraph in the article confuses me,

'Beneficial filter bacteria will be as busy as ever converting ammonia to nitrate in the aerobic areas of the biological filter, but bugs that can live in anaerobic conditions will rapidly colonise the anaerobic areas and will become equally busy taking the oxygen that they need from the nitrate that has just been produced by their cousins. This will result in that nitrate being converted back to ammonia again before it leaves.

This is a completely pointless exercise, yet it is exactly what is happening in many filter systems where the biological media is not clean. At least part of the good work being done by the aerobic bugs in the oxygen-rich areas, is being undone by anaerobic bugs in areas that are deprived of oxygen.'

I thought anaerobic areas have denitrifiying bacteria that convert NO3 to NO2 to N2O and N2. The author is stating nitrate gets converted to ammonia in anaerobic areas of a filter if the media is not clean. Is the author reffering to ammonifying bacteria that converts NO3 to NH4? A dirty filter will produce ammonia from the detritus breaking down within it. What am I missing here?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
I think your interpretation of denitrifiying filter function is correct.
NO3 to NO2 to N2O and N2 is the most common form of denitrifying filtration.
There are several ways to run this kind of filtration.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara and skyshrimp

Thread 'Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD)'

https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
View full post »
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'

Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'

The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
View full post »

Thread 'Warning of new opiod drug (nitazene) on the streets: Question re strength...'

Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...
View full post »

Similar threads

Solaculture: A novel biological approach for low cost energy?
Replies
3
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top