An article on a possible alternative to dark energy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on an article proposing time dilation and Lorentz transformations as alternatives to dark energy in explaining the accelerated expansion of the universe. Kipreos highlights that the effects of time being faster in the past could lead to a linear plot of supernova distances, negating the need for dark energy. The article's credibility is questioned due to its publication in PLOS ONE, which is noted for potential content inaccuracies. The thread was subsequently locked due to concerns over the paper's adherence to established scientific guidelines.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of time dilation in physics
  • Familiarity with Lorentz transformations
  • Basic knowledge of cosmological models
  • Awareness of scientific publication standards
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of time dilation on cosmological observations
  • Study Lorentz transformations in detail
  • Explore alternative theories to dark energy in modern cosmology
  • Investigate the peer review process and standards of scientific journals
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and researchers interested in cosmology and alternative theories to dark energy will benefit from this discussion.

Tanelorn
Messages
906
Reaction score
15
An article on a possible alternative to dark energy. Time dilation and Lorentz transformations are discussed as an alternative to dark energy:

http://phys.org/news/2014-12-alternative-explanation-dark-energy.html

"The accelerated expansion of the universe has been attributed to the effects of dark energy," Kipreos said. "However, there is no understanding of what dark energy is or why it has manifested only recently.
"The predicted effects of time being faster in the past would have the effect of making the plot of supernovas become linear at all distances, which would imply that there is no acceleration in the expansion of the universe. In this scenario there would be no necessity to invoke the existence of dark energy."I thought it was interesting for discussion, hopefully not junk, if so I apologize.

Happy new year!
 
Space news on Phys.org
PLOS ONE by a non-specialist geneticist. The Open Access URL was appreciated.
 
The reference given is to a paper published in PLOS One, which is an open access, pay to publish journal, and therefore cannot always be relied on for content that conforms to the PF guidelines. This particular paper does not; it contains some elementary misunderstandings of relativity and cosmological models. Thread locked.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K