An Exceptionally Technical Discussion of AESToE

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter garrett
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Discussion
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the mathematical intricacies of the paper "An Exceptionally Technical Discussion of AESToE," particularly the unusual math and notation such as vector-form contraction. Key issues identified include specific errata in the paper, such as the need for scaling factors in matrices on pages 18 and 22, and the misidentification of the non-compact version of E8 on page 29. Participants engage in detailed discussions about the g2-su(3) relation, Lie algebra representations, and the implications of using computational tools like Mathematica for these mathematical constructs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lie algebra and representation theory
  • Familiarity with vector spaces and direct sums
  • Knowledge of mathematical notation, particularly TeX typesetting
  • Experience with computational tools such as Mathematica or GAP
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of g2-su(3) relations in representation theory
  • Study the specifics of Lie algebra elements and their matrix representations
  • Learn about the Levi-Malcev decomposition in the context of algebraic structures
  • Investigate the application of computational tools in mathematical physics
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, students, and educators in mathematics and physics, particularly those interested in advanced topics in Lie algebra, representation theory, and computational methods in theoretical physics.

  • #481
Why did you point the citations for garrett's articles?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #482
MTd2 said:
Why did you point the citations for garrett's articles?

First because it is interesting to remark that there are some :-)

Second, because of the second one in the list, Supersymmetry and Polytopes, which is an argument independent from Garret's (and from Tony's) but touching the same theme, plus susy.
 
  • #483
Arivero, did you know that an attemptive version of SUSY E(8) GUT exists since the 80's?

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0201009

And also that recently it was found that F-Theory together with M-Theory with the usual standard model as a low energy limit, which might be need to be embeded in an E(8)?

http://arxiv.org/abs/0905.0142
 
Last edited:
  • #484
MTd2 said:
Arivero, did you know that an attemptive version of SUSY E(8) GUT exists since the 80's?

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0201009

Yes, I knew :cool: It is only that the particle content seems, to me, excesive.
 
  • #485
Does AESTOE make any new predictions, in terms of quantum gravity? Does it calculate black hole entropy?
 
  • #486
It's not a quantum theory and not consistent anyway, as far as we know.
 

Similar threads

Graduate What's the relationship between RMS framework and the Lorentz group?
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
Graduate "The 7 Strangest Coincidences in the Laws of Nature" (S. Hossenfelder)
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K
Graduate Fine structure and fixed points
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
Graduate New ideas on confinement and meson masses from Brazil
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Graduate Twistors and celestial holography
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
High School The Drunkard's Walk: A Discussion of the Text
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Philosophy of Science: Discussing Maths, Physics, Mind, & AI
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Graduate Discussing New Arxiv Papers on PhysicsForums: Possibilities & Challenges
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
12K
Undergrad Relationship Of Physics And Theorems
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Are Recent Students All Google Crazy?
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K