An Exceptionally Technical Discussion of AESToE

[MTd2]

Why did you point the citations for garrett's articles?

 

[arivero]

Why did you point the citations for garrett's articles?

First because it is interesting to remark that there are some :-)

Second, because of the second one in the list, Supersymmetry and Polytopes, which is an argument independent from Garret's (and from Tony's) but touching the same theme, plus susy.

 

[MTd2]

Arivero, did you know that an attemptive version of SUSY E(8) GUT exists since the 80's?

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0201009

And also that recently it was found that F-Theory together with M-Theory with the usual standard model as a low energy limit, which might be need to be embeded in an E(8)?

http://arxiv.org/abs/0905.0142

 

[arivero]

Arivero, did you know that an attemptive version of SUSY E(8) GUT exists since the 80's?

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0201009

Yes, I knew It is only that the particle content seems, to me, excesive.

 

[Schreiberdk]

Does AESTOE make any new predictions, in terms of quantum gravity? Does it calculate black hole entropy?

 

[suprised]

It's not a quantum theory and not consistent anyway, as far as we know.