MHB An Overview of the History of Tea

  • Thread starter Thread starter enogjini
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    History
enogjini
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
20220122_232429.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to the forum. Have you tried simplifying $(A-cI)x=(\lambda-c)x$?

Please the forum rules https://mathhelpboards.com/help/forum_rules/, especially the "Show some effort" rule.
 
First. $\lambda$ is an eigenvalue of A if and only if there exist a vector, v, such that $Av= \lambda v$. Of course, for any vector v, Iv= v so for any number c, cIv= cv. Then $(A- cI)v= Av- cIv= \lambda v- cv= (\lambda- c)v$
 

Thread '##(A/\mathfrak{a})_{\mathfrak{p}/\mathfrak{a}}## and its isomorphism?'

I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
View full post »

Thread 'Questions about non existence of GCDs vs (coimages, cokernels)'

The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
View full post »

Thread 'Trouble understanding an online solution to an exercise in Dummit & Foote'

##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
View full post »

Similar threads

History Memorable quotes in the history of physics
2
Replies
83
Views
5K
History A fascinating chart covering 4'000 years
Replies
15
Views
2K
History Interesting anecdotes in the history of physics?
6
Replies
261
Views
21K
Suggestion Why is there no 'history of physics' forum?
Replies
32
Views
4K
History Biographies, History, Philosophy of Physics
5
Replies
228
Views
16K
A Are Symposium Books as Comprehensive for Particle Physics History?
Replies
5
Views
3K
History What Makes the Kansas Museum of History in Topeka a Must-Visit?
Replies
7
Views
2K
History "The Lightning Tamers" (Nonfiction history of science book)
Replies
1
Views
1K
NACA - The Wind and Beyond - History of Aerodynamics in America
Replies
6
Views
2K
A Decoherent Histories and Measurement
Replies
49
Views
5K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top