MHB Analysis of Image superimposing using numerical analysis

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the need for resources related to image superimposing using numerical analysis, emphasizing the programming effort required for implementation. The original poster, Saugata, seeks articles or links to help understand and develop the concept. The thread was relocated to the Analysis sub-forum for better visibility and assistance. Participants are reminded to avoid text-messaging abbreviations to enhance clarity and readability. Overall, the conversation centers on finding educational materials to support the project.
saugata bose
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Dear All,

I need a few resources to get help with my above topic. The above topic depicts that: one image will be imposed on the other one, and we have to show it using numerical analysis. Of course significant amount of programming effort is required. But, I need help regarding resources/articles on how I can crack the idea. If you have any ideas, please share with me by providing links/articles or whatever you consider to be helpful.

Thank you,

Saugata
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I have moved your topic to the Analysis sub-forum, with a redirect that expires in 1 hour. You are much more likely to get help here.

The POTW sub-forums are where our admins post weekly problems for our members to solve.

Also, we ask that you do not use text-messaging abbreviations. Posting a question on a forum should be considered a more formal setting than texting a friend. Also not everyone is familiar with these abbreviations, so refraining from their use improves readability to a wider audience.
 
MarkFL said:
I have moved your topic to the Analysis sub-forum, with a redirect that expires in 1 hour. You are much more likely to get help here.

The POTW sub-forums are where our admins post weekly problems for our members to solve.

Also, we ask that you do not use text-messaging abbreviations. Posting a question on a forum should be considered a more formal setting than texting a friend. Also not everyone is familiar with these abbreviations, so refraining from their use improves readability to a wider audience.

Dear,

Thank you for your guidance.
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
321
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K