MHB Angle of Incidence: Subtracting 90 Degrees Explained

AI Thread Summary
The angle of incidence is defined as the angle between the incoming ray and the normal line to the surface. Subtracting from 90 degrees is a common method to calculate this angle, but alternative methods may exist, potentially used in Australia. The discussion emphasizes that asking why to subtract from 90 degrees lacks context, as different approaches to solving the problem may not require this step. Additionally, the focus on the angle of incidence rather than the grazing angle is noted as a customary practice. Understanding the method being used is crucial for clarity in such discussions.
yakin
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
I do not understand why we do we subtract from 90 degrees when finding the final answer for angle of incidence?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
How do you know that in Australia they don't find the angle of incidence directly, without subtracting from 90°? Also, what is the the angle of incidence?
 
Evgeny.Makarov said:
How do you know that in Australia they don't find the angle of incidence directly, without subtracting from 90°? Also, what is the the angle of incidence?

Angle of incidence is the angle from the normal to the ray. Whats up with Australia though?
 
yakin said:
Whats up with Australia though?
You are leaving out essential context to your question. Asking why you need to subtract from 90° to find the angle of incidence is like asking why you need to do multiplication to compute $2\sin(\alpha)\cos(\alpha)$. The answer is that you don't have to do multiplication: you can use the formula $2\sin(\alpha)\cos(\alpha)=\sin(\alpha+\alpha)$. "Why do we have to use..." is generally not a well-posed question; it only makes sense when you restrict yourself to a certain method of solving your problem. There may be other methods (perhaps used in Australia) where one does not need the thing you are using. And since you did not describe the method you are using to find incidence angles or the type of problems, I am saying that you are leaving out important context.

Of course, you may be asking why it is customary to be interested in the angle of incidence instead of the grazing angle. That is a different question.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top