MHB Angle of Incidence: Subtracting 90 Degrees Explained

AI Thread Summary
The angle of incidence is defined as the angle between the incoming ray and the normal line to the surface. Subtracting from 90 degrees is a common method to calculate this angle, but alternative methods may exist, potentially used in Australia. The discussion emphasizes that asking why to subtract from 90 degrees lacks context, as different approaches to solving the problem may not require this step. Additionally, the focus on the angle of incidence rather than the grazing angle is noted as a customary practice. Understanding the method being used is crucial for clarity in such discussions.
yakin
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
I do not understand why we do we subtract from 90 degrees when finding the final answer for angle of incidence?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
How do you know that in Australia they don't find the angle of incidence directly, without subtracting from 90°? Also, what is the the angle of incidence?
 
Evgeny.Makarov said:
How do you know that in Australia they don't find the angle of incidence directly, without subtracting from 90°? Also, what is the the angle of incidence?

Angle of incidence is the angle from the normal to the ray. Whats up with Australia though?
 
yakin said:
Whats up with Australia though?
You are leaving out essential context to your question. Asking why you need to subtract from 90° to find the angle of incidence is like asking why you need to do multiplication to compute $2\sin(\alpha)\cos(\alpha)$. The answer is that you don't have to do multiplication: you can use the formula $2\sin(\alpha)\cos(\alpha)=\sin(\alpha+\alpha)$. "Why do we have to use..." is generally not a well-posed question; it only makes sense when you restrict yourself to a certain method of solving your problem. There may be other methods (perhaps used in Australia) where one does not need the thing you are using. And since you did not describe the method you are using to find incidence angles or the type of problems, I am saying that you are leaving out important context.

Of course, you may be asking why it is customary to be interested in the angle of incidence instead of the grazing angle. That is a different question.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top