Angles between 4-vectors in special relativity?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the definition of angles between 4-vectors in the context of special relativity, particularly focusing on 4-velocity vectors and their properties in Minkowski spacetime. Participants explore the implications of using traditional definitions of angles and the resulting mathematical relationships.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how to define the angle between two 4-vectors and presents the dot product of two 4-velocity vectors, noting that it leads to a cosine value greater than or equal to 1, which raises questions about its meaning.
  • Another participant suggests that the inner product of unit timelike vectors corresponds to the hyperbolic cosine of rapidity, indicating a relationship between rapidity and speed, while noting that this reframes Lorentz transformations in a way analogous to Euclidean rotations.
  • There is a distinction made between unit timelike and unit spacelike vectors, with the inner product having different interpretations based on the type of vectors involved.
  • One participant expresses a preference for the concept of rapidity, while distinguishing it from celerity, and suggests that rapidity may not be particularly useful in the context of general relativity.
  • Another participant provides equations relating velocity, celerity, time-dilation factor, and Doppler factor to rapidity, indicating a mathematical framework for understanding these concepts.
  • A reference to an older thread is provided, which may contain additional insights on the topic of angles between spacelike and timelike vectors.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the usefulness of rapidity and celerity, as well as the interpretation of angles in the context of 4-vectors. The discussion does not reach a consensus on these points.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the definitions and interpretations of angles in Minkowski spacetime differ from traditional Euclidean definitions, leading to potential misunderstandings about the implications of the mathematical results.

LightPhoton
Messages
42
Reaction score
3
TL;DR
How do we define angles in relativity? do we change the usual euclidean definition or extend it?
How is the angle between two 4-vectors defined in special relativity? Consider two 4-velocity vectors:

$$U^\mu=(1,0), \\ V^\mu=\gamma_{rel}(1,v_{rel})$$

Where the vectors are written in the frame of the particle with ##U^\mu##.

The dot product between these is
$$U^\mu V_\mu=\gamma_{rel}$$

If we define angle ##\theta## between two vectors as:

$$\cos\theta=\frac{U^\mu V_\mu}{\vert U\vert\vert V\vert}$$

then since all velocity vectors have magnitude of ##1##, we get ##\cos\theta= \gamma_{rel}\geq 1##.

But what does this mean?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LightPhoton said:
TL;DR Summary: How do we define angles in relativity? do we change the usual euclidean definition or extend it?

How is the angle between two 4-vectors defined in special relativity? Consider two 4-velocity vectors:

$$U^\mu=(1,0), \\ V^\mu=\gamma_{rel}(1,v_{rel})$$

Where the vectors are written in the frame of the particle with ##U^\mu##.

The dot product between these is
$$U^\mu V_\mu=\gamma_{rel}$$

If we define angle ##\theta## between two vectors as:

$$\cos\theta=\frac{U^\mu V_\mu}{\vert U\vert\vert V\vert}$$

then since all velocity vectors have magnitude of ##1##, we get ##\cos\theta= \gamma_{rel}\geq 1##.

But what does this mean?
It means Minkowski spacetime is manifestly non-Euclidean.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hornbein and Ibix
If both ##U## and ##V## are unit and timelike then their inner product is ##\cosh\psi##, where ##\psi## is the rapidity. Rapidity has a one-to-one relationship with speed, and is additive (at least in one dimension). But it's not much used except to reframe the Lorentz transforms as manifestly the Minkowski analogue to Euclidean rotations.

If both ##U## and ##V## are unit and spacelike then their inner product is the Euclidean inner product.

If the vectors are different types the inner product remains useful, but I'm not sure it has a meaningful interpretation in terms of angle-type quantities.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale and PeterDonis
Hornbein said:
I always liked rapidity a.k.a. celerity.
Rapidity and celerity are different things. Rapidity is ##\psi## and ##v=c\tanh\psi##, but celerity is ##dx/d\tau=\gamma v##

I think rapidity is one of those things that isn't particularly useful once you go on to GR, so it's an interesting but fairly niche concept. Celerity is best forgotten about, IMO.
 
velocity = c tanh (rapidity)
celerity = c sinh (rapidity)
time-dilation-factor = cosh (rapidity)
Doppler-factor = exp (rapidity)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
991
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K