Angular acceleration, friction, and turntables

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the time it takes for a copper block to slip on a turntable due to angular acceleration. The block is 33.8 cm from the center, with a static friction coefficient of 0.52 and an angular acceleration of 0.226 rad/s². Participants explore the relationship between tangential and centripetal acceleration, emphasizing the need to consider both components to find the total acceleration. The maximum static friction force is calculated, and participants are guided to use kinematic equations to determine the time to reach the critical acceleration without slipping. Ultimately, the correct approach leads to a clearer understanding of the problem and a solution of approximately 17.177 seconds.
exi
Messages
85
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A copper block rests 33.8 cm from the center of a turntable. The coefficient of static friction between the block and turntable is 0.52. The table starts from rest and accelerates with an angular acceleration of 0.226 rad/s².

Acceleration of gravity = 9.8 m/s².

After what interval, in seconds, will the block start to slip on the turntable?

Homework Equations



Tangential acceleration = angular acceleration * radius, so At = 0.226 * 0.338 = 0.0764 m/s².

The Attempt at a Solution



I've got the turntable drawn out with a radius of 0.338 m, a block on the edge with unknown mass and a tangential acceleration of 0.0764 m/s², and µ = 0.52.

I'm a little hazy on how to progress; does the lack of mass information pose a problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: Consider the total acceleration, not just the tangential component.

What's the maximum static friction force possible? Thus, what's the maximum acceleration that the friction can create?
 
Doc Al said:
Hint: Consider the total acceleration, not just the tangential component.

What's the maximum static friction force possible? Thus, what's the maximum acceleration that the friction can create?

If static friction is <= µs*Fn, I would try to take it from there, but I'm at a loss as to how to go about something with an unknown mass. Unfortunately, this question (and several others on this particular assignment) go to a significantly greater depth than what we've seen in lecture, so it's a bit confusing to a relative beginner.
 
Call the mass "m". Maybe you won't need it. :wink:

Hint: What's the maximum acceleration that the friction can create without slipping?
 
Doc Al said:
Call the mass "m". Maybe you won't need it. :wink:

Hint: What's the maximum acceleration that the friction can create without slipping?

Well, friction force would be equal to or less than 5.096*m if I'm going about this the right way, which means... sorry, I'm a little lost. I'm sure I'm overlooking something right in front of me, but I'm having a hard time seeing this clearly at the moment.
 
exi said:
Well, friction force would be equal to or less than 5.096*m if I'm going about this the right way, which means... sorry, I'm a little lost. I'm sure I'm overlooking something right in front of me, but I'm having a hard time seeing this clearly at the moment.

Now, what is the maximum acceleration the block can have withouit slipping?
 
Doc Al said:
Call the mass "m". Maybe you won't need it. :wink:

Hint: What's the maximum acceleration that the friction can create without slipping?

nrqed said:
Now, what is the maximum acceleration the block can have withouit slipping?

Guys, I think we might not have covered that in any great detail in the hurried lectures leading up to the last exam we just had. I'm afraid I'm not sure what the relationship is between frictional force and acceleration. (The other question about tangential acceleration I had posted was also new territory for us.) :frown:
 
exi said:
Well, friction force would be equal to or less than 5.096*m if I'm going about this the right way, which means...
You're doing fine. But I would suggest that you express things symbolically wherever possible and only plug in numbers when you need to calculate an answer. I'd write that as: Max Friction = µmg.

exi said:
Guys, I think we might not have covered that in any great detail in the hurried lectures leading up to the last exam we just had. I'm afraid I'm not sure what the relationship is between frictional force and acceleration.
It's the same relationship between any force and acceleration: Newton's 2nd law.
 
Doc Al said:
You're doing fine. But I would suggest that you express things symbolically wherever possible and only plug in numbers when you need to calculate an answer. I'd write that as: Max Friction = µmg.


It's the same relationship between any force and acceleration: Newton's 2nd law.

Okay, so as far as that goes, µmg = ma, which is a = µg. So if that's the acceleration you were hinting towards as far as the most the block can endure without slipping away, how does that play into the rest of the info given in the question?
 
  • #10
See my hint in post #2. You found the tangential acceleration, what about the radial (a.k.a centripetal) component? What affects that component?
 
  • #11
This is what I've been doing:

Taking from the above, frictional force where µ = 0.52, once solved through Newton's second, is coming out to be 5.096 m/s². I was under the impression that this would be acting along the radius of the circle, so using ac = v²/r, I found velocity, and tried to use that to find a period via v = 2*pi*r / T - and end up with 1.6182 s, which is not a correct answer.

Where is my error in thought? I've got 85% of this thing completed, and the rest is due at midnight tonight, so I'm trying to understand what I'm still missing...
 
  • #12
exi said:
Taking from the above, frictional force where µ = 0.52, once solved through Newton's second, is coming out to be 5.096 m/s².
That's the maximum total acceleration, not the radial component. Since you know the tangential component, figure out the radial component.

I was under the impression that this would be acting along the radius of the circle, so using ac = v²/r, I found velocity, and tried to use that to find a period via v = 2*pi*r / T - and end up with 1.6182 s, which is not a correct answer.
You're on the right track, just using the wrong value for the centripetal acceleration.
 
  • #13
Doing the same thing that I did for another question where I had to find the total acceleration, I'm getting a number that's within thousandths of a point, and working it out again, the "answer" is also within a thousandth or two - probably well within the 1% margin of error we have, so apparently I'm still doing something wrong.

Tangential acceleration is equal to angular acceleration (rad/s²) * radius (m), right? I was able to sketch things and use straight Pythagorean theorem to find the answer on a similar question... hrmph.
 
  • #14
exi said:
Doing the same thing that I did for another question where I had to find the total acceleration, I'm getting a number that's within thousandths of a point, and working it out again, the "answer" is also within a thousandth or two - probably well within the 1% margin of error we have, so apparently I'm still doing something wrong.
You're right. Accounting for the tangential acceleration makes a negligible correction. (My bad for not checking!)

I see what you did wrong:

exi said:
...so using ac = v²/r, I found velocity, and tried to use that to find a period via v = 2*pi*r / T - and end up with 1.6182 s, which is not a correct answer.
This is an incorrect approach. (Again, I must have been sleeping before.) You have the speed and the acceleration (the tangential acceleration)--use simple kinematics to find the time it takes to attain that speed.
 
  • #15
I've got several kinematics equations in front of me - one-dimensional, projectile motion, some circular motion, ... - but nothing for circular motion that incorporates strictly time in seconds. I suppose I'm missing something useful there.
 
  • #16
The tangential acceleration (which you calculated in post #1) works just like any other one-dimensional linear acceleration. (The fact that it's going in a circle doesn't matter.)
 
  • #17
Doc Al said:
The tangential acceleration (which you calculated in post #1) works just like any other one-dimensional linear acceleration. (The fact that it's going in a circle doesn't matter.)

Ohhhhhhhhh, that makes perfect sense now; 17.177s makes much more sense. Epiphany, ahoy.

Thanks so much for walking me through it.
 
  • #18
My pleasure. (Sorry if I threw you off a bit before.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K