What is the angular speed of the rollers after 1.14 s?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angular speed of rollers supporting a plank that accelerates at 2.24 m/s². The initial angular speed is zero, and after 1.14 seconds, the calculation yields an angular acceleration of 5.045 rad/s². The final angular speed is computed as 5.75 rad/s. However, a critical point is raised regarding the factor of two; the rollers do not simply follow the plank's acceleration due to their free-rolling nature. Ultimately, the correct approach requires adjusting for this factor, leading to a revised understanding of the relationship between linear and angular acceleration in this context.
annao
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A plank of wood sits on top of two rollers with radius of 44.4 cm. The plank is pulled forward so it moves at a constant acceleration of 2.24 m/s^2, starting from rest, and the rollers roll without slipping along the ground and in contact with the plank. What is the angular speed of the rollers after 1.14 s? Express your answer in rad/s.

Homework Equations


media%2Ffe6%2Ffe688a78-1523-4a26-89e0-03c6816c6024%2F49a6e28c-9948-4ec2-84cb-e0ffc07e1ff9.png
=a/r
w=wo+
media%2Ffe6%2Ffe688a78-1523-4a26-89e0-03c6816c6024%2F49a6e28c-9948-4ec2-84cb-e0ffc07e1ff9.png
t

The Attempt at a Solution


wo=0 rad/s; t=1.14 s; a=2.24 m/s^2; r=0.444 m

media%2Ffe6%2Ffe688a78-1523-4a26-89e0-03c6816c6024%2F49a6e28c-9948-4ec2-84cb-e0ffc07e1ff9.png
=a/r = 2.24/0.444 = 5.045 rad/s^2

w=wo+
media%2Ffe6%2Ffe688a78-1523-4a26-89e0-03c6816c6024%2F49a6e28c-9948-4ec2-84cb-e0ffc07e1ff9.png
t = 0+5.045*1.14

w=5.75 rad/s

Am I on the right track? Do I need to divide by 2 because there are two rollers?

Thank you
 

Attachments

  • Rollers.png
    Rollers.png
    4.4 KB · Views: 358
  • media%2Ffe6%2Ffe688a78-1523-4a26-89e0-03c6816c6024%2F49a6e28c-9948-4ec2-84cb-e0ffc07e1ff9.png
    media%2Ffe6%2Ffe688a78-1523-4a26-89e0-03c6816c6024%2F49a6e28c-9948-4ec2-84cb-e0ffc07e1ff9.png
    187 bytes · Views: 321
  • media%2Ffe6%2Ffe688a78-1523-4a26-89e0-03c6816c6024%2F49a6e28c-9948-4ec2-84cb-e0ffc07e1ff9.png
    media%2Ffe6%2Ffe688a78-1523-4a26-89e0-03c6816c6024%2F49a6e28c-9948-4ec2-84cb-e0ffc07e1ff9.png
    187 bytes · Views: 327
  • media%2Ffe6%2Ffe688a78-1523-4a26-89e0-03c6816c6024%2F49a6e28c-9948-4ec2-84cb-e0ffc07e1ff9.png
    media%2Ffe6%2Ffe688a78-1523-4a26-89e0-03c6816c6024%2F49a6e28c-9948-4ec2-84cb-e0ffc07e1ff9.png
    187 bytes · Views: 305
  • media%2Ffe6%2Ffe688a78-1523-4a26-89e0-03c6816c6024%2F49a6e28c-9948-4ec2-84cb-e0ffc07e1ff9.png
    media%2Ffe6%2Ffe688a78-1523-4a26-89e0-03c6816c6024%2F49a6e28c-9948-4ec2-84cb-e0ffc07e1ff9.png
    187 bytes · Views: 355
Physics news on Phys.org
You are definitely on the right track. In fact you’ve done it almost comletely right.

You do not need to divide by 2 because there are two rollers. They say two rollers just because it is more natural than saying the plank is balancing on one roller.

However you have missed a factor of 2 for an unrelated and kind of tricky reason. Free rollers don’t stay put relative to the ground, but they also don’t travel with the plank. When you say α = a/r, what exactly is a?

Consider 2 examples If the rollers were rigidly glued to the bottom of the plank and the ground was made slippery, when the plank accelerated with linear acceleration = a the top of the roller would have the full linear acceleration of the plank = a, but would have no angular acceleration. So α ≠ a/r in this case a/r. Similarly, if the rollers turned on an axles rigidly attached to the ground, the contact point would accelerate with the plank. This time, however, α = a/r.

What happens with free rollers?
 
I think I have it figured out, the answer is divided by two because the top rolls have twice the speed as the centre.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
832
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K