MHB Answer:Finding Value of k & Probability of A Winning at Least 2 Matches

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kudasai
  • Start date Start date
Kudasai
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Two ping-pong players $A$ & $B$ play a series of 10 matches. The probability that $A$ wins any of the matches is $0.2$

a) If the probability that $A$ wins exactly $k$ matches in the series is $0.888$. What's the value of $k$?

b) What's the probability that $A$ wins at least two matches?

---------------

I ain't good with these stuff, so I hope you guys may help me please. :D
The part a) states that $A$ could win 2, 3, 5 or 8 matches and the probability is the same, is this assumption correct? How to find the value of $k$?

As for b), how can I compute the asked probability? I know that $A$ has probability of wining any of the patches with value $0.2$, but when it says "at least," I can understand it.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kudasai said:
Two ping-pong players $A$ & $B$ play a series of 10 matches. The probability that $A$ wins any of the matches is $0.2$

a) If the probability that $A$ wins exactly $k$ matches in the series is $0.888$. What's the value of $k$?

b) What's the probability that $A$ wins at least two matches?

---------------

I ain't good with these stuff, so I hope you guys may help me please. :D
The part a) states that $A$ could win 2, 3, 5 or 8 matches and the probability is the same, is this assumption correct? How to find the value of $k$?

As for b), how can I compute the asked probability? I know that $A$ has probability of wining any of the patches with value $0.2$, but when it says "at least," I can understand it.

Thank you.

The probability that A wins k games of the 10 games is... $\displaystyle P \{k=0 \} = \binom {10}{0}\ .2^{0}\ .8^{10} = .10737...$

$\displaystyle P \{k=1 \} = \binom {10}{1}\ .2\ .8^{9} = .2684...$

$\displaystyle P \{k=2 \} = \binom {10}{2}\ .2^{2}\ .8^{8} = .3019...$

$\displaystyle P \{k=3 \} = \binom {10}{3}\ .2^{3}\ .8^{7} = .201326...$

... and it is fully evident that P= .888 doesn't correspond to any value of k. The probability $P\{k \ge 2\}$ is... $\displaystyle P\{k \ge 2\} = 1 - P\{k = 0\} - P\{k= 1\}\ (1)$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Last edited:
I agree with chisigma that for part a) there is no solution, however, I suspect the given probability should be approximately 0.088. Then we may write:

$${10 \choose k}(0.2)^k(0.8)^{10-k}\approx0.088$$

Try successive values for $k$.

For part b) I would use the fact that:

$$P(\text{A wins less than two})+P(\text{A wins at least two})=1$$

We can arrange this as:

$$P(\text{A wins at least two})=1-P(\text{A wins zero OR A wins 1})$$

Can you proceed?
 
Okay so I have for b) that

$P(A)=1-P(A^c),$ so $P(A)=1-0.2=0.8.$ Is it correct? I think it's too easy to be correct.

Thanks.
 
Kudasai said:
Okay so I have for b) that

$P(A)=1-P(A^c),$ so $P(A)=1-0.2=0.8.$ Is it correct? I think it's too easy to be correct.

Thanks.

Yes, that's not correct. You want:

$$P(\text{A wins at least two})=1-P(\text{A wins zero OR A wins 1})$$

Now, we may write:

$$P(\text{A wins zero OR A wins 1})=P(\text{A wins zero})+P(\text{A wins one})$$

And apply the binomial probability formula to each event on the right.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top