MHB Answer: Image Direct Sum & Linear Operator: Is Union Equal?

Fermat1
Messages
180
Reaction score
0
Given 2 subspaces and a linear operator, is the image of the direct sum of the subspaces equal to the union of the images under the operator?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fermat said:
Given 2 subspaces and a linear operator, is the image of the direct sum of the subspaces equal to the union of the images under the operator?

Thanks
This is not true.

For a counterexample:
Let $V=\mathbb R^2$ and $X=\{(x,0):x\in\mathbb R\}$ and $Y=\{(0,y):y\in\mathbb R\}$.

Then $X$ and $Y$ are subspaces of $V$.

Let $I$ be the identity operator on $V$.

You can see that $I(X\oplus Y)\neq I(X)\cup I(Y)$.To make your statement true you can have:
Given 2 subspaces of a vector space $V$ and a linear operator on $V$, the image of the direct sum of the subspaces is equal to the sum of the images under the operator.
 
The world of 2\times 2 complex matrices is very colorful. They form a Banach-algebra, they act on spinors, they contain the quaternions, SU(2), su(2), SL(2,\mathbb C), sl(2,\mathbb C). Furthermore, with the determinant as Euclidean or pseudo-Euclidean norm, isu(2) is a 3-dimensional Euclidean space, \mathbb RI\oplus isu(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (1,3), i\mathbb RI\oplus su(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (3,1), SU(2) is the double cover of SO(3), sl(2,\mathbb C) is the...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K