MHB Answer: Image Direct Sum & Linear Operator: Is Union Equal?

Fermat1
Messages
180
Reaction score
0
Given 2 subspaces and a linear operator, is the image of the direct sum of the subspaces equal to the union of the images under the operator?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fermat said:
Given 2 subspaces and a linear operator, is the image of the direct sum of the subspaces equal to the union of the images under the operator?

Thanks
This is not true.

For a counterexample:
Let $V=\mathbb R^2$ and $X=\{(x,0):x\in\mathbb R\}$ and $Y=\{(0,y):y\in\mathbb R\}$.

Then $X$ and $Y$ are subspaces of $V$.

Let $I$ be the identity operator on $V$.

You can see that $I(X\oplus Y)\neq I(X)\cup I(Y)$.To make your statement true you can have:
Given 2 subspaces of a vector space $V$ and a linear operator on $V$, the image of the direct sum of the subspaces is equal to the sum of the images under the operator.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top