Answer Radium & Town Population: 200yrs, 800k

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bergausstein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Application
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on two mathematical problems involving exponential decay and population growth. For the first problem, the remaining amount of radium after 200 years is calculated to be approximately 92.16 mg, using the formula for exponential decay. The second problem determines that a town's population, currently at 300,000, will reach 800,000 in approximately 35.38 years, based on its doubling time of 25 years. The calculations utilize logarithmic functions and the properties of exponential growth and decay.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of exponential decay and growth models
  • Familiarity with logarithmic functions
  • Basic knowledge of calculus, specifically integration and differentiation
  • Ability to manipulate and solve equations involving natural logarithms
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of exponential decay in radioactive materials
  • Learn about population dynamics and the logistic growth model
  • Explore the application of natural logarithms in real-world scenarios
  • Investigate the use of differential equations in modeling growth and decay processes
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying calculus and differential equations, environmental scientists analyzing radioactive decay, and urban planners assessing population growth trends.

bergausstein
Messages
191
Reaction score
0
1. Radium decomposes at a rate proportional to the amount at any instant. In 100 years, 100mg of radium decomposes to 96mg. How many mg will be left after 200 years?

2. if a population of a town doubled in the past 25 years and the present population is 300,000 when will the town have a population of 800,000?prob 1.

since 3mg of 100mg radium have decomposed over a period of 100 years this amount is 3% of the original amount.$\frac{R_0-0.03R_0}{R_0}=\frac{R_0\,e^{k100}}{R_0}$

$\ln(1-0.03)=\ln(e^{k100})$

$\ln(1-0.03)=100k$

$k=\frac{\ln(1-0.03)}{100}$

when t=200

$R(200)=R_0\,e^{\ln(1-0.03)^2}$

$R(200)=100(0.9409)$

$R=94.09mg$ is this correct?

prob 2

$\frac{dP}{dt}=kP$

$P(t)=P_0\,e^{kt}$

when t=25; $P_0=2P_0$

$\frac{2P_0}{P_0}=\frac{P_0\,e^{25k}}{P_0}$

$2=e^{25k}$

$\ln2=25k$

$k=\frac{\ln2}{25}$$\frac{dP}{dt}=kR$

$P(t)=P_0\,e^{kt}$

$P(t)=P_0\,e^{\frac{\ln2}{25}t}$

$800,000=300,000(2^{\frac{t}{25}}$

$\ln2.67=\frac{t}{25}\ln2$

$t= 35.42$years

is this correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
bergausstein said:
1. Radium decomposes at a rate proportional to the amount at any instant. In 100 years, 100mg of radium decomposes to 96mg. How many mg will be left after 200 years?

2. if a population of a town doubled in the past 25 years and the present population is 300,000 when will the town have a population of 800,000?prob 1.

since 3mg of 100mg radium have decomposed over a period of 100 years this amount is 3% of the original amount.$\frac{R_0-0.03R_0}{R_0}=\frac{R_0\,e^{k100}}{R_0}$
Where did ".03" come from? The problem said that amount reduced from 100 to 96 mg. Where did the "3 mg" you refer to come from?
100-96= 4.

$\ln(1-0.03)=\ln(e^{k100})$

$\ln(1-0.03)=100k$

$k=\frac{\ln(1-0.03)}{100}$

when t=200

$R(200)=R_0\,e^{\ln(1-0.03)^2}$

$R(200)=100(0.9409)$

$R=94.09mg$ is this correct?

prob 2

$\frac{dP}{dt}=kP$

$P(t)=P_0\,e^{kt}$

when t=25; $P_0=2P_0$

$\frac{2P_0}{P_0}=\frac{P_0\,e^{25k}}{P_0}$

$2=e^{25k}$

$\ln2=25k$

$k=\frac{\ln2}{25}$$\frac{dP}{dt}=kR$

$P(t)=P_0\,e^{kt}$

$P(t)=P_0\,e^{\frac{\ln2}{25}t}$

$800,000=300,000(2^{\frac{t}{25}}$

$\ln2.67=\frac{t}{25}\ln2$

$t= 35.42$years

is this correct?
When I do it, using 8/3= 2.66666666666666667, I get 35.38 years. Don't round off until you have to! But the data given: 800,000, 300,000, and 25 are at most to 2 significant figures so I would say answer years anyway.
 
If we're going to actually solve an initial value problem, we could develop the general formula as follows:

$$\frac{dy}{dt}=ky$$ where $$y(0)=y_0$$

Separate variables, integrate with respect to $t$, switch dummy variables for clarity, and use the given boundaries as limits:

$$\int_{y_0}^{y(t)}\frac{1}{u}\,du=k\int_0^t\,dv$$

Apply the FTOC:

$$\ln\left|\frac{y(t)}{y_0} \right|=kt$$

Now, if we are given another point on the solution $\left(a,y_a \right)$ then we have:

$$\ln\left|\frac{y_a}{y_0} \right|=ka\implies k=\frac{1}{a}\ln\left|\frac{y_a}{y_0} \right|$$

And so we find:

$$\ln\left|\frac{y(t)}{y_0} \right|=\frac{1}{a}\ln\left|\frac{y_a}{y_0} \right|t$$

Hence:

(1) $$y(t)=y_0\left(\frac{y_a}{y_0} \right)^{\frac{t}{a}}$$

(2) $$t=\frac{a\ln\left|\frac{y(t)}{y_0} \right|}{\ln\left|\frac{y_a}{y_0} \right|}$$

Now we have formulas to answer this type of problem.

Problem 1: We want to use (1).

We identify:

$$y_0=100\text{ mg},\,y_a=96\text{ mg},\,a=100\text{ yr},\,t=200\text{ yr}$$

Plugging this into (1), we obtain:

$$y(t)=100\left(\frac{96}{100} \right)^{\frac{200}{100}}\text{ mg}=100\left(\frac{24}{25} \right)^2\text{ mg}=\frac{2304}{25}\text{ mg}=92.16\text{ mg}$$

Your error was, as HallsofIvy pointed out, one of subtraction.

Problem 2: We want to use (2).

We identify:

$$a=25\text{ yr},\,y_0=150000\,y_a=300000,\,y(t)=800000$$

Plugging this into (2), we obtain:

$$t=\frac{25\ln\left|\frac{800000}{150000} \right|}{\ln\left|\frac{300000}{150000} \right|}\text{ yr}=\frac{25\ln\left(\frac{16}{3} \right)}{\ln\left(2 \right)}\text{ yr}$$

Now, we want to subtract 25 from this because the starting point is 25 years ago. So we find the population will be 800,000 approximately 35.3759374819711 years from now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K