Answer to Sakurai 2.22 makes no sense

  • Thread starter Thread starter QFT25
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sakurai
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 4K views
QFT25
Messages
24
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Consider a particle of mass m subject to a one-dimensional potential of the following form:

(1/2)k*x^2 x>0

Infinity for 0<x

Find <x^2> for the ground state

Homework Equations



<x^2>= <Psi|x^2|Psi>

The Attempt at a Solution



I know the answer is 3*h/(4*m*w) but to me that makes no sense. That answer was derived using the first excited state of the ground state for the potential in which there is no infinite wall at x=0. That state is normalized for -Infinity to Infinity. But in our circumstance the motion can only be from 0 to Infinity. That means I need to re-normalize the wave function so that it it's norm is 1 from 0 to Infinity. When I do that and calculate the expectation value I get 3*h/(2*m*w). I don't understand how you can use a wave function which is not normalized from 0 to Infinity to calculate < x^2> from 0 to infinity
 
Physics news on Phys.org
QFT25 said:
I know the answer is 3*h/(4*m*w) but to me that makes no sense.
Where did you get that answer?
 
DrClaude said:
Where did you get that answer?
The solutions manual. I think it has an error.
 
QFT25 said:
The solutions manual. I think it has an error.
I agree. The wave function has to be renormalized.