Ant on a Tightrope physics problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter anaksunamoon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The physics problem involves determining the minimum wave amplitude "A_min" required for an ant on a tightrope to become momentarily weightless as a sinusoidal wave passes beneath it. The key parameters include the tension "T_s" in the rope, the mass per unit length "mu", the wavelength "lambda", and the acceleration due to gravity "g". The solution requires establishing that the maximum acceleration of the wave must equal "g" for the ant to be shaken off, leading to the equation: A_min = (g * lambda^2) / (4 * π^2 * (T_s / mu)).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of sinusoidal wave mechanics
  • Knowledge of tension in strings and ropes
  • Familiarity with harmonic motion and acceleration
  • Basic grasp of wave properties such as wavelength and amplitude
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of wave equations in physics
  • Learn about the relationship between tension, mass per unit length, and wave speed
  • Explore harmonic motion and its equations of motion
  • Investigate real-world applications of wave mechanics in engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on wave mechanics, as well as educators teaching concepts related to harmonic motion and tension in strings.

anaksunamoon
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm really confused where to start on this problem. I'm not sure what I need to solve it.

A large ant is standing on the middle of a circus tightrope that is stretched with tension "T_s". The rope has mass per unit length "mu". Wanting to shake the ant off the rope, a tightrope walker moves her foot up and down near the end of the tightrope, generating a sinusoidal transverse wave of wavelength "lambda" and amplitude "A". Assume that the magnitude of the acceleration due to gravity is "g".

What is the minimum wave amplitude "A_min" such that the ant will become momentarily weightless at some point as the wave passes underneath it? Assume that the mass of the ant is too small to have any effect on the wave propagation.
Express the minimum wave amplitude in terms of T_s, mu, lambda, and g.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anaksunamoon said:
I'm really confused where to start on this problem. I'm not sure what I need to solve it.

A large ant is standing on the middle of a circus tightrope that is stretched with tension "T_s". The rope has mass per unit length "mu". Wanting to shake the ant off the rope, a tightrope walker moves her foot up and down near the end of the tightrope, generating a sinusoidal transverse wave of wavelength "lambda" and amplitude "A". Assume that the magnitude of the acceleration due to gravity is "g".

What is the minimum wave amplitude "A_min" such that the ant will become momentarily weightless at some point as the wave passes underneath it? Assume that the mass of the ant is too small to have any effect on the wave propagation.
Express the minimum wave amplitude in terms of T_s, mu, lambda, and g.


The ant becomes momentarily weightless when the piece of rope it stands on moves downward with acceleration g. There is a transverse wave propagating along the rope, its speed is

v=\sqrt{\frac{T_s}{\mu}}.

The frequency f can be obtained from the wavelength and from the speed as

f = \frac{v}{\lambda}

Assuming a sinusoidal wave of amplitude A, the maximum acceleration of the points of the rope is

a_{max} = \omega^2 A = 4\pi^2 f^2 A = g

ehild
 
Little Problem

Okay since I'm solving for a_max, I need to use the variables g, f, A.

What I did was I inserted the values (v/lambda) for f in the equation 4*PI^2*f^2*A = g, then I inserted sqrt(T_s/mu) for "v". Then I divided that whole thing by g and I got it wrong.

This is what I came up with

(4*(PI^2)*A*(((sqrt(T_s/mu))*(1/lambda))^2))/g

Should it be negative since it's going downward? I think I'm on the right track, but I'm not sure. What does finding the maximum have to do with finding the minimum?



(btw, thanks echild)
 
anaksunamoon said:
Okay since I'm solving for a_max, I need to use the variables g, f, A.

What I did was I inserted the values (v/lambda) for f in the equation 4*PI^2*f^2*A = g, then I inserted sqrt(T_s/mu) for "v". Then I divided that whole thing by g and I got it wrong.


You have to find the minimum amplitude which yields an acceleration of maximum magnitude equal to g. The ant is shaken off at the moment when the rope accelerates downward below all its six feet and this acceleration is at least as big as g. I hope you understand what I mean :).

Do you remember the time dependence of the displacement, velocity and acceleration of a point which performs harmonic vibration? It is something like

y = A \cos (\omega* t),

the velocity is v = -A \omega \sin (\omega* t),

and the acceleration is

a = -A \omega^2 \cos (\omega* t)

A is the amplitude of the wave traveling along the rope, and also the amplitude of vibration at the place of the ant. You have to find an appropriate A (how much you have to shake the rope) so as the acceleration some time during the vibration should be equal to g.

You see that the maximum acceleration during the vibration is

a_{max} = A* \omega^2 = 4\pi^2 f^2.

It is enough if only the maximum of the acceleration is as big as g: the ant is shaken off at the moment when the acceleration reaches this value. To get this value, the amplitude must exceed some minimum and you have to determine this minimum value of the amplitude.

.
This is what I came up with

(4*(PI^2)*A*(((sqrt(T_s/mu))*(1/lambda))^2))/g



What does this stand for?

You need to give an equation in the form: "the minimum amplitude should be A_{min} = F(\lambda, \mu, T_s, g)"

Anyway, do not forget that you have f^2, so the square root will cancel.

ehild
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
39K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
25K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
Replies
8
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K