Anti-matter annihilation and the CMBR

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between anti-matter annihilation and the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR), exploring the implications of matter-antimatter asymmetry and the thermal history of the universe. Participants examine the origins of the CMB and its temperature in the context of cosmic inflation and the early universe's conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the assertion that the CMB is primarily the result of matter-antimatter annihilation, suggesting that the thermal motion of plasma during recombination is a more significant factor in its creation.
  • There is a discussion about the energy density of radiation diluting faster than that of matter due to redshift, with some noting that the radiation temperature at the time of CMB release was significantly higher than it is today.
  • One participant emphasizes that the matter asymmetry in the early universe is estimated to be about 1 part in 10 billion, based on CMB measurements, and asserts that science relies on observational evidence.
  • Another participant points out that the temperature of the CMB at emission was determined by the cooling of primordial plasma, independent of the mechanisms that generated the earlier higher temperatures.
  • There is a clarification regarding the relationship between temperature and scale factor, with one participant correcting another's statement about the temperature of radiation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the role of matter-antimatter annihilation in the formation of the CMB, with some supporting the idea while others challenge it. The discussion includes both agreement on certain aspects, such as the matter asymmetry measurement, and ongoing debate regarding the implications of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the energy of the CMB has been redshifted over time, leading to uncertainty about the exact implications of this redshift on the current understanding of the CMB's energy and temperature. There are also unresolved questions about the specific numbers related to energy densities and temperatures at different epochs.

Herbascious J
Messages
165
Reaction score
7
Recently I watched a lecture on Anti-matter and the Standard Model...

...At one point Dr. Quinn, makes the statement that the CMB is the resulting energy left over from the annihilation of the matter and anti-matter which arose during cosmic inflation (leaving behind only one part in 30 million of ordinary matter). Wouldn't there be far more radiation in the CMB if this were true? Wouldn't the temperature be much higher? I was under the impression that the energy of the cmb was considerably lower than the energy found in matter in the universe.
 
Space news on Phys.org
The CMB was directly created by the thermal motion of the plasma in the early universe. During recombination, electrons combined with protons and this opaque plasma turned into transparent gas. This allowed the thermal radiation to propagate freely throughout the universe and it has, over time, been redshifted from the visible frequencies into the microwave frequencies. Perhaps Dr. Quinn means that the thermal energy of his plasma was mostly generated from the annihilation of matter and antimatter, which would have left a significant amount of energy behind as photons, which were then absorbed into the plasma and turned into heat.

Herbascious J said:
I was under the impression that the energy of the cmb was considerably lower than the energy found in matter in the universe.

That's a good question. I know much of the energy initially in the CMB has been lost as expansion redshifted it. I'm not sure what the numbers are though.
 
Wrote a long post, but Drakkith basically said the same. Let me just add regarding the numbers:
Radiation energy density dilutes faster than matter by one power of the scale factor (due to redshift of the momentum in addition to number density dilution). With the CMB at redshift z ~ 1000, matter energy density has gained roughly three orders of magnitude on radiation since then. This also means radiation temperature was a factor 1e3 higher at the CMB release (temperature is related to energy per photon). With the number density decrease, the photon energy density today is a factor 1e12 lower than at CMB release.
 
The matter asymmetry of the early universe is generally agreed to be about 1 part in 10 billion based on CMB measurements. Science is based on observational evidence, not philosophy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Herbascious J
Chronos said:
The matter asymmetry of the early universe is generally agreed to be about 1 part in 10 billion based on CMB measurements. Science is based on observational evidence, not philosophy.

What part of this is philosophy?
 
Apologies Drak, been reading too many threads at once.
 
To add another point: the temperature of the CMB at emission was set by the temperature at which the primordial plasma cooled to become a gas. It has nothing to do with how the earlier, higher temperature was generated.

Also, I think it's easier to understand what's going on by looking how expansion impacts temperature rather than energy density: temperature of radiation is inversely proportional to the scale factor. Since things in our universe are, on average, about 1100 times further away from one another than they were when the CMB was emitted, the current CMB temperature is 1/1100th the temperature of the CMB when it was emitted.

One final point: within the primordial plasma, photons and normal matter were interacting very strongly. Because of this, the temperature of normal matter was the same as the temperature of the photons, right up until the CMB was emitted. When the normal matter became a gas, its behavior diverged significantly from the behavior of the CMB.
 
Last edited:
Chalnoth said:
temperature of radiation is inversely proportional to temperature.
I think you intended to write scale factor. :)
Also, how is this different from what I wrote?
Orodruin said:
This also means radiation temperature was a factor 1e3 higher at the CMB release
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
9K