Antimatter and Antigravity Connected ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Antonio Lao
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Antimatter
Click For Summary
The discussion explores the relationship between antimatter and gravity, questioning whether antimatter could exhibit antigravity effects. It is established that while matter is attracted to matter, the gravitational interactions involving antimatter remain largely theoretical and have not been experimentally verified. Participants debate the implications of antimatter's properties, including its mass equivalence to matter and the potential for repulsive gravitational effects if large quantities of antimatter existed. The conversation also touches on the fundamental forces in the quantum realm, emphasizing that gravity is not a dominant force at that scale. Overall, the consensus leans towards the idea that antimatter behaves similarly to matter in terms of gravitational attraction, with no current evidence supporting the existence of antigravity.
  • #31
Retro-update on the confinement of anti-particle. Many years ago, Dehmelt was able to confine an anti-particle named Priscilla in a Penning trap for an indefinite time. Long enough to verify some of the constants of nature and for more precisions in their numerical values. Dehmelt and Wolfgang Paul, together with Ramsey, shared the 1989 Nobel Prize in physics for their works.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Exactly!

Good update, for now.
 
  • #34
I fail to see how the Weeks et al paper breaks any new ground. All it does is arrive at the conclusion the observable universe is finite. That is not the same as saying the 'real' universe is finite. It only infers that our ability to observe is finite. Duh. We cannot 'prove' anything is 'true'. We can only prove that certain pairs of things cannot both be true simultaneously. Our inability to solve the 3 body problem of gravitational attraction illustrates how incompetent we are, not to mention our inability to solve the Dirac equation for anything more complex than a hydrogen atom. We have much to learn.
 
  • #35
Chronos said:
Our inability to solve the 3 body problem of gravitational attraction...

Could nature be simpler than what we want it to be? Newton's law of universal gravitation is a 2-body problem (though a mass disparity of very large and very small). Coulomb's law of electrostatic force is also a 2-body problem of electric charges.

But the n-body problem is solved using statistical mechanics which necessarily incorporate the theory of probability and random variables. Anything more than 3 bodies, probability is involved and the process becomes stochastic instead of deterministic. But when n is just a little bit greater than 2, perturbation theory can be used. In astrodynamics, the n-body problem is solved by taking the interaction of 2 bodies at a time and then add all the 2-body interactions together.
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K