Antimatter Annihilation in Angels & Demons

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the depiction of antimatter annihilation in the film "Angels & Demons." Participants assert that the explosion resulting from 1 gram of antimatter would yield approximately 180 terajoules, equivalent to 40 kilotons of TNT, significantly more destructive than portrayed. The conversation highlights the necessity of advanced technology, such as ultravacuum chambers and magnetic confinement, to handle antimatter safely. Additionally, the discussion critiques the film's portrayal of the terrorists' technological capabilities, suggesting that conventional explosives would have sufficed for their destructive goals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of E=mc² and matter-energy conversion
  • Basic knowledge of antimatter and its properties
  • Familiarity with the energy yield of nuclear weapons
  • Awareness of advanced containment technologies for antimatter
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of antimatter in theoretical physics
  • Explore the engineering challenges of creating magnetic confinement systems
  • Study the energy release mechanisms of antimatter versus nuclear reactions
  • Investigate the historical context and effects of the Tsar Bomba detonation
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, film critics, science fiction enthusiasts, and anyone interested in the realistic portrayal of advanced scientific concepts in media.

AbsoluteZer0
Messages
124
Reaction score
1
Hello,

Last night I rented Angels & Demons and observed a number of physical flaws. I noticed that the explosion following the annihilation of the antimatter in the canister was not as intense as what I had expected, which may not be a flaw as I am merely a novice in the realm of physics. However, I would imagine that such a quantity of antimatter would produce an explosion with an intensity far greater than that of the one that was shown. Although it is purely fictitious and poetic license comes into play, am I correct in assuming that the explosion would, under normal circumstances, have been far more cataclysmic?

Thanks,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In terms of pure energy release it should be a full matter-energy conversion. So for any given amount of antimatter you should double the mass(you need ordinary matter to annihilate it with) and plug it in into E=mc^2.
I haven't seen the film, so I don't know how much antimatter was there, but for comparision, annihilating an average sized cat should net around 800PJ, or four times the amount of energy released by the Tsar Bomba - the highest yield thermonuclear device ever detonated.
 
O.k., so I watched a clip from that film on youtube. It "looks" like a very small amount of antimatter. Let's say it's 1g. After plugging all the numbers we get 180 TJ, or roughly 40 kilotons of TNT. That's roughly twice the yield of Fat Man. Considering the state that bomb left Nagasaki in after being detonated 500m up in the air, the people in the film would probably evaporate too.

Of course, it only "looks" like 1g to me, which means that it could be pretty much anything, including a suitably smaller amount to cause only minor distress to Mr Hanks' character.
 
Bandersnatch said:
O.k., so I watched a clip from that film on youtube. It "looks" like a very small amount of antimatter. Let's say it's 1g. After plugging all the numbers we get 180 TJ, or roughly 40 kilotons of TNT. That's roughly twice the yield of Fat Man. Considering the state that bomb left Nagasaki in after being detonated 500m up in the air, the people in the film would probably evaporate too.
It would probably have taken out all of Vatican City. So obviously they used much less antimatter. The amount of antimatter would have to be very small. However, the equipment needed to isolate it from the environment would have been enormous. One would need an ultravacuum chamber, and special magnetic confinement containers to keep it from touch the sides. The power needed to run this equipment would have been enormous.
They might as well detonated the power source that was used to power the magnetic confinement container.
Bandersnatch said:
Of course, it only "looks" like 1g to me, which means that it could be pretty much anything, including a suitably smaller amount to cause only minor distress to Mr Hanks' character.
If there was so little antimatter, then the villains should have tried conventional explosives.
Strangely, the entire effort was relatively low tech. The antimatter is advanced science, of course. However, the terrorist in the movie clip don't seem to use any other advanced technology. These guys hadn't advanced far beyond the Gunpowder Plot.
Terrorists are doing just fine with Improvised Explosive Devices. One truck with a ton of fertilizer would have done as much damage as that "antimatter." Of course, they could have transported it with robotic Drones. And how was it triggered. No one in the Vatican has cell phones?
 
I believe there was 0.25 grams of antimatter, which would be about 45 TJ, about half of what Bandersnatch guesetimated. Doesn't really change much though.
 
Antimatter bombs are a bit different from nuclear weapons - most of their energy goes to high-energetic photons and muons, which can spread over ~1km or more before they release their energy. So the shockwave is smaller, but people in the vatican would probably receive a serious radiation dose. Some days ago, the effects were discussed in this thread.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
11K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K