Antimatter falling upwards because of gravity?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the behavior of antimatter, specifically antihydrogen, in relation to gravity. Participants explore whether antihydrogen might fall upwards or exhibit other unusual gravitational effects, as well as the implications of such behavior on fundamental physics concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Debate/contested, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants reference ongoing experiments at CERN aimed at observing the gravitational behavior of antihydrogen, questioning whether it might fall upwards.
  • One participant expresses confusion about the idea of antimatter being repelled by gravity, suggesting that this would imply negative mass, which they find difficult to reconcile with established physics.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the notion of antimatter having anti-gravity properties lacks a basis in current understanding, citing skepticism about the idea.
  • A participant mentions that if antimatter were to fall upwards, it would violate energy conservation principles and lead to observable discrepancies in gravitational experiments.
  • Some participants agree that, based on current knowledge, antimatter is expected to fall downwards at the same rate as regular matter.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the idea of antimatter exhibiting anti-gravity properties is speculative and lacks empirical support. However, there remains disagreement about the implications of such speculation and the interpretations of existing theories.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the discussion is based on speculative ideas and ongoing research, with no definitive conclusions drawn regarding the gravitational behavior of antimatter.

rollcast
Messages
403
Reaction score
0
http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-05-cern-scientists-confine-antihydrogen-atoms.html

One of the big questions in physics is whether antihydrogen atoms occupy the same energy levels as hydrogen; others of course want to know how it reacts to gravity, as some have speculated that antihydrogen might actually fall up, or behave in other unexpected ways. The experiments going on at CERN might just answer both those questions, and more.

Up next for the ALPHA team are plans to cool a small bunch of antihydrogen atoms in such a way as to allow them to watch as it either rises or falls due to gravity, thus answering one of the more exciting questions regarding antimatter, in perhaps just the next few months.


When I read this I couldn't get my head around it, they are try to suggest that something with mass would be repulsed by gravity instead of attracted by it. This would mean the antihydrogen has a mass of a negative quantity, if I'm getting this so far.

However negative quantities as far as I understood would be highly unlikely as that would be like the same as saying that triangle has side of length -10cm?

Have I missed out a large part of the physics of this or am I just stupid

Thanks
AL
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
As it said, it's purely speculation, at least for the time being. It doesn't really make any sense to me to be honest. I say that because there's only so far you can take the "it's exactly opposite" thought process.
 
I agree with the above comments. That anti-matter has anti-gravity properties has no basis(so far)
An interesting comment from that link said something like "well, why doesn't a lone anti-proton fall up?"
To be sure, I'm not even close to being an expert, so I guess I'll see whatever results come about.
 
It is all but certain that antimatter falls down. If it fell up, energy conservation would be violated, and we would see composition dependent gravitational forces in Eotvos-type experiments. Would it be nice to see for certain? Sure...but nobody expects anything besides "it falls down at 9.8 m/s2"
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
645
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
9K