Antimatter Bomb: Real or Fiction?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hagopbul
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility and reality of antimatter bombs, exploring theoretical concepts, practical challenges, and comparisons to existing nuclear weapons. Participants examine the production, storage, and potential energy release of antimatter in the context of weaponization.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that while the concept of an antimatter bomb is real, practical methods to create one do not currently exist.
  • One participant cites the extreme cost and time required to produce antimatter, noting that one gram would cost $100 quadrillion and take 2 billion years to produce.
  • Another participant provides technical details about the production of antiprotons at Fermilab, including energy release calculations from annihilation events.
  • Concerns are raised about the existing nuclear arsenal, questioning why the idea of an antimatter bomb is perceived as more frightening than current nuclear capabilities.
  • There is speculation about the potential for a customized facility to produce and store antimatter more efficiently than current methods, but doubts remain about the time required to accumulate sufficient quantities for a bomb.
  • A question is posed regarding the logistics of storing and transporting large amounts of antiprotons, indicating a need for further exploration of practical challenges.
  • Some participants seek clarification on the relationship between protons and positrons, indicating a potential area of confusion or interest.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the concept of an antimatter bomb exists but disagree on its feasibility and the implications of its potential existence. Multiple competing views remain regarding the practicality of antimatter production and storage.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the unclear definitions of "real" versus "fiction" in the context of antimatter bombs, the dependence on current technological capabilities, and unresolved questions about the logistics of antimatter handling.

hagopbul
Messages
397
Reaction score
45
i have this simple and easy Q

is the antimatter bomb real or fiction

i will say fiction But...:(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The concept is real. In practice nobody knows how to make one.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter_weapon
"At the current level of production, one gram of antimatter would cost $100 quadrillion (100,000,000,000,000,000) and would take 2 billion years to produce"
 
Fermilab usually has over 1012 antiprotons (about 0.2 microCoulombs) circulating in the 6,280-meter-circumference Tevatron (beam tube diameter about 7.5 cm) at about 980 GeV (gamma = 1044, beta = 0.999 999 5). Each annihilating antiproton at rest would release about 3 x 10-10 joules, so 1012 annihilating antiprotons will release about 300 joules of energy (note: TNT has about 4000 joules per gram). You cannot store antiprotons in a suitcase for very long.
See http://www.fnal.gov/
 
Last edited:
I should point out that there are already many times as many nuclear bombs (fission and fusion) in the world to irradicate the entire surface of the Earth many times over. I've never understood why the prospect of a bigger sort of bomb was so scary to people. OH NO! We can destroy the Earth now... oh... wait... we could already do that. But ya, as has been pointed out, at the moment we don't know a good way to make that much antimatter. I imagine a customized "antimatter producing facility" could generate and store it much better than CERN but it would still take millions of years to accumulate enough to make a bomb that was simply EQUALLY as powerful as a nuke.
 
maverick_starstrider said:
... I imagine a customized "antimatter producing facility" could generate and store [antimatter] much better than CERN but it would still take millions of years to accumulate enough to make a bomb that was simply EQUALLY as powerful as a nuke.
CERN started making and using an antiproton beam many years ago, but they turned if off as soon as they realized that the antimatter production rate at Fermilab was much higher, and also that the Tevatron collision energies were much higher.

Question: How would you store and transport 1000 Coulombs of antiprotons? (This about 0.01 moles, so their mass is about 0.01 grams).
 
protons and positrton ?
 
kasun bandara said:
protons and positrton ?
Is that a question or a statement?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K