1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Any complicated maths problems?

  1. Sep 10, 2011 #1
    Hey, I'm an A-level maths student and I was wondering if anybody has any pretty complicated equations that can be solved using just the rules of indicies and general algebra.

    I ask because we're not really doing much in year 13 yet and I love a challenge when it comes to maths lol.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 10, 2011 #2

    micromass

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    Here are some fun ones:

    Easy:
    - Find two perfect squares such that their difference is 63.

    - Find a 5-digit number (which is not 00000) such that the cube of the first two digits is that 5 digit number. Thus find XYZUV such that [itex]XY^3=XYZUB[/itex]

    Moderate:
    -Find 1000000 consecutive integers which are not prime.

    - Take a regular n-gon whose vertices lie on the unit circle. Take one vertex and call it x. Draw lines between all the vertices and x. Prove that the product of the lengths of these lines is exactly n.
    Generalize.

    Hard:
    Take the numbers [itex]1,2,3,...,2^{1000}+100[/itex]. The average of these numbers is not an integer. How many ways are there to remove 3 consecutive numbers in this sequence such that the average is an integer?

    Unsolved:
    Take an arbitrary positive integer [itex]x_0[/itex]. If this is even, then write [itex]x_1=x_0/2[/itex]. If [itex]x_0[/itex] is odd, then write [itex]x_1=3x_0+1[/itex]. If [itex]x_1[/itex] is even, then [itex]x_2=x_1/2[/itex]. If [itex]x_1[/itex] is odd, then [itex]x_2=3x_1+1[/itex]. Continue to define [itex]x_n[/itex].
    Prove: For every arbitrary [itex]x_0[/itex] we pick, there exists an n such that [itex]x_n=1[/itex].

    Good luck!!
     
    Last edited: Sep 10, 2011
  4. Sep 10, 2011 #3
    Okay, I got the very first one with no mathematics at all lol, 12 and 9 were just the only logical answers that sprang to mind straight away.
    However, with the second one can you give me a hint as to how I should start it, I've written down:
    ABCDE=AB^3
    Obviously that isn't an algebraically correct way of setting it out as that assumes A*B*C*D*E=A*(B^3).
    what would you do from there, please don't tell me the answer, just give me a little nudge :P
     
  5. Sep 10, 2011 #4

    micromass

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    OK, I'll write down the equation that you need to solve. You need to find [itex]0<x<100[/itex] such that

    [tex]x^3-1000x<100[/tex]

    Do you see what I did?
     
  6. Sep 10, 2011 #5

    micromass

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    Follow-up question: let a be an odd number. Is a necessarily the difference of two squares?
    Follow-up question: what if the condition that a is odd is dropped?
     
  7. Sep 10, 2011 #6

    micromass

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    Some tricky questions:

    Easy:
    Say you have all the integers between 2 and 100 written on cards. Take the card "2". Fold the card and fold every card divisible by 2. Then take "3". Fold the card and fold every card divisible by 3 (and 6 gets to get be folded twice now). Do the same with 4,5,6,...,100.
    Find the end position of the card. Which ones are folded??

    Moderate:
    There are 1000 ants walking on a stick. They can only walk right or left. If they bump into another ant, then they change their direction. If they come to one of the ends of the stick, then the ant falls of the stick.
    Assume that the stick is 1m long and that every ant walk 0.1 m/s. How long does it maximally take for the stick to have no ants on it??
     
  8. Sep 10, 2011 #7

    Where did the 1000x bit dome from?
    Sorry, it's 2:30am, I'm really tired and my head isn't working properly lol.
     
  9. Sep 10, 2011 #8

    micromass

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    Oops, it's wrong. It has to be

    [tex]0<x^3-1000x<1000[/tex]

    Well, try to solve it now. I won't be giving any more hints now :wink:
     
  10. Sep 11, 2011 #9
    Here's another one: Can you express any whole number as the sum of distinct powers of 2? If so, can you do it for distinct powers of 3? 4? n?

    Besides the actual proof-writing, it's something any one can play around with and see what happens. And depending on your background, you could be surprised what type of things come out of this.

    And here's a fun one: Are there an infinite number of primes? Are there an infinite number of primes whose difference with another prime is 2?
     
  11. Sep 11, 2011 #10
    I understand the 1000x now.
    I've got x=32

    I rearranged it to 0<x(x2-1000)<1000
    As x had to be a 2 digit number, I tried x=10 and x=99 but both were far out of the acceptable range.

    I then used trial and error going up in multiples of 10 from 10->30 and got x=32 :)

    That method seemed pretty messy though, is there a more mathematical way of working it out?
     
  12. Sep 11, 2011 #11

    Okay, I had no clue with this one so I scaled it down to 10 ants on a 1cm long stick all moving at 10 cm/s

    They were arranged like this:
    >>>>><<<<<
    and by my calculations it took 0.14 seconds for the stick to be completely empty.

    Assuming it works to scale then the 1m long stick should take 14 seconds to empty.
     
  13. Sep 11, 2011 #12

    micromass

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    Close, but it only takes at most 0.1 seconds. I'm curious as to which calculations you did, though...
     
  14. Sep 11, 2011 #13

    micromass

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    Well, you need to find x such that

    [tex]0<x(x^2-1000)<1000[/tex]

    So let's solve [itex]x(x^2-1000)=0[/itex], this yields [itex]x\sim 32[/itex]. So 32 should be the first number such that [itex]0<x(x^2-1000)<1000[/itex].
     
  15. Sep 11, 2011 #14
    Yeah I guess I messed the ant thing up lol.
    How would you start that one off?
     
  16. Sep 11, 2011 #15

    micromass

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    hint: bumping doesn't matter. You can do like the ants walk through eachother.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook