Any Feasible Faster-Than-Light Interstellar Travel?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ascendant0
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interstellar travel
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Faster-than-light (FTL) interstellar travel is deemed impossible based on current scientific understanding. The discussion highlights that technologies like the Alcubierre drive, which theoretically requires negative mass, remain unfeasible. While near-light-speed travel could allow for visits to multiple star systems within a passenger's lifetime due to time dilation, stationary observers would perceive significant limitations. Overall, the consensus is that FTL travel contradicts established physics, and no foreseeable advancements will change this reality.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity and its implications on space-time.
  • Familiarity with concepts of time dilation and length contraction.
  • Knowledge of theoretical constructs like the Alcubierre drive.
  • Basic principles of physics at a college level.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Alcubierre drive and its theoretical requirements.
  • Study the implications of time dilation and length contraction in relativistic physics.
  • Explore current advancements in propulsion technologies for near-light-speed travel.
  • Investigate the concept of negative mass and its role in theoretical physics.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, aerospace engineers, science fiction enthusiasts, and anyone interested in the theoretical limits of space travel and the laws of physics.

Ascendant0
Messages
176
Reaction score
37
TL;DR
As our technology advances and based on what we know to exist now, is there any feasible way to bend space-time to the point where interstellar travel comparable to say Star Trek is one day possible?
I'm not talking sci-fi, not talking "10yrs to the next solar system" speeds, and not including things we don't even know actually exist (like exotic matter). I'm talking interstellar travel like star ships, speeds one day comparable to what you see in sci-fi now, such as Star Trek?

While my knowledge in physics is only at 3rd year college level, I of course know our technology isn't nearly there yet. I also know that bending space to the extent where you could travel the vast distances between solar systems would take an energy source greater than a few of our suns. But, what I'm asking about is in hundreds (or maybe thousands) of years from now, is there any way based on our resources and technological advances that we could travel the stars at speeds where we could visit multiple solar systems in a lifetime?

If so, what technology or other resources would it require? How far off do you feel we are from getting there?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ascendant0 said:
TL;DR Summary: As our technology advances and based on what we know to exist now, is there any feasible way to bend space-time to the point where interstellar travel comparable to say Star Trek is one day possible?
No
Ascendant0 said:
I'm not talking sci-fi, not talking "10yrs to the next solar system" speeds, and not including things we don't even know actually exist (like exotic matter). I'm talking interstellar travel like star ships, speeds one day comparable to what you see in sci-fi now, such as Star Trek?
No
Ascendant0 said:
While my knowledge in physics is only at 3rd year college level, I of course know our technology isn't nearly there yet. I also know that bending space to the extent where you could travel the vast distances between solar systems would take an energy source greater than a few of our suns.
Uh ... you are WAY low on that estimate. If we COULD do it, which we can't, I think it would take a lot more energy than that.
Ascendant0 said:
But, what I'm asking about is in hundreds (or maybe thousands) of years from now, is there any way based on our resources and technological advances that we could travel the stars at speeds where we could visit multiple solar systems in a lifetime?
Highly unlikely
Ascendant0 said:
If so, what technology or other resources would it require? How far off do you feel we are from getting there?
I seriously doubt we will EVER get there.
 
Feasible? No, not at all. The closest thing would be the Alcubierre drive, but since that requires 'negative mass' (something not believed to exist) it's not within the realm of 'feasible'.

Ascendant0 said:
But, what I'm asking about is in hundreds (or maybe thousands) of years from now, is there any way based on our resources and technological advances that we could travel the stars at speeds where we could visit multiple solar systems in a lifetime?
Thanks to time dilation and length contraction you can feasibly visit many star systems within one lifetime of a passenger by traveling at near-c speed, but from the POV of a 'stationary' observer in one of the star systems a person is limited to visiting perhaps a handful of nearby star systems within the 'stationary' observer's lifetime.

FTL travel simply isn't possible according to science as we currently understand it. It is always possible we'll discover something new in the future that will allow it, but I doubt it.
 
Our best current understanding of the laws of physics is that FTL travel is impossible.

Thread closed.
 
@Ascendant0 The argument against faster-than-light travel is not based on technical limitations. It's not like the old "man will never fly" arguments put forth in the 19th century when no one imagined that the power-to-weight ratios achieved by 20th-century internal combustion and jet engines would remove all sorts of technical limitations.

The argument that we cannot get from point A to point B faster than a flash of light is more like the argument that we will never find two integers ##a## and ##b## such that ##(a/b)^2=2## - if we assume that is possible we encounter logical contradictions. For an example of the difficulties that arise you might try googling for "tachyonic antitelephone".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 118 ·
4
Replies
118
Views
12K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K