Is there really nothing faster than light?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter SvenDahlhaus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Faster than light Light
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
40 replies · 5K views
bob012345 said:
It seems fast to our everyday experience but I have always been struck by how slow the speed of light is in comparison to the scale of the universe. Or on the scale of the laboratory when accurate time bases might be required across a room when lightspeed is only ~30 cm/ns.
Or in relation to modern computing: the PC I am typing this on has 6 cores each of which can multiply a 64 bit float in the time it takes light to reach my eyes from the screen.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bob012345
Physics news on Phys.org
hmmm27 said:
So why is it "space is expanding", not "everything is shrinking" ?
I know this isn't a serious question but still:
Occam's Razor is pretty useful here.

In the 'space is expanding' scenario, only one thing need change: spacetime.
In the 'everything is shrinking' scenario, multiple things must change - not just matter but also the speed of light.
 
Dale said:
What is the experimental distinction between the two?
Is there one ? (doable with current knowledge)
 
pbuk said:
I am typing this on has 6 cores each of which can multiply a 64 bit float in the time it takes light to reach my eyes from the screen.

Don't sit so close to the screen. It's bad for your eyes.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: phinds, pbuk and berkeman
Vanadium 50 said:
Don't sit so close to the screen. It's bad for your eyes.
Yes you are right, I had in my head that FMUL was 5 cycles but it's only 4, and again I was thinking 2.5GHz for about 2' from the screen but my new beast is much faster than that.
 
hmmm27 said:
Is there one ? (doable with current knowledge)
There isn’t, which is why the question is pointless. It is a distinction without a difference.
 
hmmm27 said:
Our what ?

Might want to check your reference for the speed of light : it's considerably faster than a measly 15M km per hour.
The speed of light is 300,000 Km/sec
 
Dale said:
There isn’t, which is why the question is pointless. It is a distinction without a difference.
WEl, it's not that there isn;t
Keldude said:
The speed of light is 300,000 Km/sec
Perhaps you missed @hmmm27's post here?
 
jbriggs444 said:
15,000,000 is 1.4 percent of 1,080,000,000
:eek:Still scary fast. Thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444
PeroK said:
Your English is fine. It's your arithmetic that's bad!
“Your calculations are correct, but your physics is atrocious.” Einstein to Lemaître.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50, protonsarecool and vanhees71