Why Do Stars Flicker but Not Planets?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mohdfasieh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Genius
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Stars flicker due to atmospheric effects, while planets appear stable because they have a larger angular size. The discussion highlights that stars, like Aldebaran, produce a flux of 10-6 lumens/m2, which translates to a specific number of photons entering the observer's eye, influenced by the size of the pupil and observation time. The flickering is primarily a result of light direction changes caused by varying air density, not a decrease in photon count. When atmospheric conditions are calm, stars may appear less flickering.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of light flux and lumens
  • Basic knowledge of atmospheric physics
  • Familiarity with angular size and its impact on light perception
  • Concept of photon behavior in different mediums
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the physics of light refraction in the atmosphere
  • Learn about the properties of light sources and angular size
  • Explore the concept of photon counting and measurement techniques
  • Investigate the effects of atmospheric conditions on astronomical observations
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physics students, and anyone interested in understanding the visual differences between stars and planets in the night sky.

mohdfasieh
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
HELLO,

CAn any genius solve this question.I have tried my best but iam unable to get the answer.


QUESTION 1 ; "Stars are know to flicker.Estimate the number of photons entering the eye of an observer when he looks at the star of first apparent visual magnitude.Such a star produce flux on the surface of the Earth of 10 (exp) -6 lumens/m^2 .One lumen is 0.0016 watts.Star Aldebaran is an example . Why do stars flicker,Not the palnets or very little.




QUESTION 2 :In positron atom both the electron and the positron mive with the center of amss that is sationary .Calculate the ground state energy of the positron atom.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think stars flicker more than planets as they are lot further away.The intermediary medium has varied properties so they appear as blinking.
 
But the "intermediary medium" is, primarily, the atmospher which is just a deep for planets as for stars. The actual reason is that planets have a disk while stars do not. If you look at planets in a telescope, all those that are visible with the naked eye, you will see a disk. If you look at stars in a telescope, no matter how how powerful the telescope, you see a single point. Even with the naked eye, you see a tiny disk, as opposed to a point of light. A disk is not as easily covered or "warped" by a change in the density of the atmosphere as a single point.

Oh, and to find how many photons enter the eye, you will need to know the size of the pupil as well as the time period involved.
 
Stars flicker because of atmospheric effects only. Think about what the sun looks like when seen from the bottom of a pool of water with ripples in the surface. The flicker of stars is similar, but instead of the varying surface of a pool, the reason light gets bent in various directions in the atmosphere is due to the fact that air does not have uniform density.

Sometimes, if the air is very still, the stars will not flicker.

The flicker can be described two different ways. What your eye perceives is a change in intensity. But what is really going on is a change in direction. Sometimes the intensity is lower because the light changed direction and missed you.

Both a star and a planet are "disk" sources of light, but a star is far smaller. A planet is so much larger (in angular area) that there is always some light that makes it to your eye. Another way of putting this is that the amount of change to the direction of light due to flicker is LESS than the angular size of the planet. Thus the planet stays in view and appears stable.

The flicker effect has nothing to do with the number of photons entering the eye. In both the case of a planet or a first magnitude star, you will find that the number of photons received by the eye is a fairly large number, per second.

Carl
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
24K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K