Anyone else feeling the sting of recession?

  • Thread starter tribdog
  • Start date
In summary, the housing crisis has severely affected an engineering/surveying company, leading to multiple lay-offs and office closures. The newest employees who have brought in new business are the only ones with job security. The future of the company and the industry it serves looks bleak, with a potential recovery time of over a year. Employees are worried about job security and are considering their options. The acquisition by a larger company has not prevented rumors of more layoffs. Some industries, such as oil and mining, are seeing an increase in business while others, like technology, have been declining for some time.
  • #1
tribdog
769
17
The engineering/surveying company I work for used to focus about 99% of their business into designing residential subdivisions. This housing crisis has completely destroyed the company. A couple of months ago we had our first lay-off. Today we closed our Mexico office, and I'm pretty sure our India office is closing as well. About 75% of the people in this office are being laid off. I'm the newest employee in the whole company and by all rights I should be the first to go but thankfully me and my partner took the initiative several months ago to spend about 50% of our time going out and finding new jobs. We are the only people who have brought in any large amounts of money, so our jobs are safe. Well, safe as possible.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It wouldn't be like this if people were doing what Henry Ford did...
 
  • #3
What? Hire children?
 
  • #4
Man, this sucks. I hate being in the office while people are getting laid off. I'll tell you one thing though I won't go quietly like everyone seems to be doing. I'll take all the clients I've brought in with me. I think I might go for a drive, these offices are just too dungeon like right now.
 
  • #5
I'm so hated right now. Lots of these people have been here 5-10 times longer than I have and they aren't happy I'm safe.
 
  • #6
I am definitely worried about my job. My work is linked to the engineered wood industry (OSB, plywood, glulam beams, I-joists, etc.) We've already laid off three people and closed a lab.

Given the inventory back log (houses that are already built but not sold + warehoused inventory of building products), even if the economy snapped back today, our industry wouldn't start to recover for over a year.

Well, there's no sign that the economy will start to uptick anytime soon. Since my duties here are not in the "core" area of our business, I feel like a dead woman walking.

The really sad part is I love my job!

I've been trying to decide if I should start looking for new work, or wait until the inevitable pink slip.
 
  • #7
lisab said:
I am definitely worried about my job. My work is linked to the engineered wood industry (OSB, plywood, glulam beams, I-joists, etc.) We've already laid off three people and closed a lab.

Given the inventory back log (houses that are already built but not sold + warehoused inventory of building products), even if the economy snapped back today, our industry wouldn't start to recover for over a year.

Well, there's no sign that the economy will start to uptick anytime soon. Since my duties here are not in the "core" area of our business, I feel like a dead woman walking.

The really sad part is I love my job!

I've been trying to decide if I should start looking for new work, or wait until the inevitable pink slip.

You should always have your Plan B ready to go. Right now is when you should be looking for your next job. Watching others get laid off is bad but being the last to be laid off is really bad. Good time to http://chemistryjobs.acs.org/search/browse/" [Broken]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #8
Being there a long time doesn't give them more right to keep their job than you. All that matters is how good a worker is at their job. The best person will be the last to go.
 
  • #9
It's a good thing I specialize in building roads. We always need new roads, so I'm not as expendable as most of the others here.
 
  • #10
Kurdt said:
Being there a long time doesn't give them more right to keep their job than you. All that matters is how good a worker is at their job. The best person will be the last to go.

Not necessarily. Like many businesses, we offers many services but the core services are our strong suit. The first place that gets cut is "extra" services. I'm a chemist, not a structural engineer; it would be impossible for me to transition into an engineering position. (It would be dumb, too -- why would I dump almost 20 years of work experience to start at the bottom rung?)
 
  • #11
The company I work for has recently been aqcuired by a much larger company. They are already forcing early retirements and laying off security personnell. Rumors abound that more layoffs in management are not far behind. Some of the upper level management have been jumping ship already. Funny, since the company just procured an 8 figure contract over the next decade or so.
 
  • #12
lisab said:
Not necessarily. Like many businesses, we offers many services but the core services are our strong suit. The first place that gets cut is "extra" services. I'm a chemist, not a structural engineer; it would be impossible for me to transition into an engineering position. (It would be dumb, too -- why would I dump almost 20 years of work experience to start at the bottom rung?)

I took that as read in this particular set of circumstances.
 
  • #13
I am self-employed and work pretty much across the manufacturing sector - from twinkie makers to the launch control systems for the NMD. Consequently I am somewhat immune to the health of any subsector. But, no doubt, blood is running in the streets. For one of my customers [ultimately linked to auto sales], sales have dropped by about 95% over the last six months.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
We sell to oil industry and gold/uranium mining and are seeing a 40%/year increase in business, we can't ship products fast enough.

On the other hand when oil and mining crash - they really crash!
 
  • #15
When clinton left office we were in the positive. How did we manage to get into the hole? Was Iraq really that expensive? Or is it china and India stealing all our industry?
 
  • #16
It's been happening for a long time. In technology it's been going downhill since the infamous "dot.com" boom.

Back in the 80's interest on mortgage loans hit 16%. In Houston, TX, there were over 3,000 foreclosures a month. You couldn't give away a house.

My company sucks. They have been grossley mismanaged and the CEO was recently booted, but there is so much wrong in this company, it is unlikely to survive, unless they become a very small player. We are having massive layoffs, no raises, and no dividends paid on stock.

I brought up all of these problems several years ago when I started work here and was told to shut up. Now, everything I said that was wrong with this company is a major issue. :rolleyes: Go figure.
 
Last edited:
  • #17
Much of this stems from the housing crisis.

Deficit spending - that would be your neocons [alleged conservatives].

As for manufacturing: Death and destruction. For example, not long ago I was proud to have played a key role in developing a fantastic new American product - molecular oriented pvc. Almost as soon as we finished, the product rights and company were sold to a company in China.

For about eight years I did engineering and consulting for Boeing. For the last three years I have been writing classes to train overseas manufacturers, for Boeing.

Airbus just got the order to build tanker planes for the USAF even though there is currently a lawsuit charging Airbus with unfair trade practices.
 
Last edited:
  • #18
Cyrus said:
When clinton left office we were in the positive. How did we manage to get into the hole? Was Iraq really that expensive? Or is it china and India stealing all our industry?

It is *great* trade agreaments that Clinton started and Bush continued. Let's have three cheers for NAFTA, CAFTA, SHAFTA. When a country outsources almost all of its manufacturing industries/capability and imports a large majority of its consumer goods, trouble is not far behind.

Free trade is good , but it is only good when there is trade not the enormous deficits that are currently saddled with this country. As far as I know the US has no trade surplus with any country or even a balance. If I'm wrong someone please post a link showing otherwise.

So no the war is not killing this country financially, it is the loss of the ability for the US to produce anything. India and China have our industry, but look on the bright side at this rate we will be a third world nation soon and all the industry will be flocking back here to take advantage of the week dollar. I'm just praying that we don't hit the low of the Weimar Republic. I don't like the idea of having to use a wheel barrow as my wallet to goto the store.
 
  • #19
Ivan Seeking said:
As for manufacturing: Death and destruction. For example, not long ago I was proud to have played a key role in developing a fantastic new American product - molecular oriented pvc. Almost as soon as we finished, the product rights and company were sold to a company in China.
So the Chinese are no good because they won't buy from us. And our employers are no good because they sell to the Chinese. You don't miss a trick do you?
 
  • #20
jimmysnyder said:
So the Chinese are no good because they won't buy from us. And our employers are no good because they sell to the Chinese. You don't miss a trick do you?
Um China does buy from us. They buy coal, scrap metal, and other raw materials. Then they make products and sell them to the US at a significant multiple of what they buy. That's one factor contributing to a net flow of capital/money flowing out of the US.

Here's a couple of snapshots -

hina enjoyed a 35.4-billion-US-dollar surplus in its balance of payments in 2002, up 104 percent over the previous year. http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200305/23/eng20030523_117090.shtml

http://www.census.gov/indicator/www/ustrade.html [Broken] (March 11, 2008)
Goods and Services Increases in January 2008
The Nation’s international deficit in goods and services increased to $58.2 billion in January from $57.9 billion (revised) in December, as imports increased more than exports.

Basically, the US runs a trade deficit of about $700 billion/yr and then countries like China and Japan use the cash issues loans back to the US government and economy.

My company is actually doing reasonably well, and we a looking overseas for business.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #21
Cyrus said:
When clinton left office we were in the positive.
Wrong. When Clinton left office we were the negative.
How did we manage to get into the hole? Was Iraq really that expensive? Or is it china and India stealing all our industry?
The economy is cyclical and the cycle typically lasts anywhere from 5-10 years. Our last recession (there is still some debate over if you could really call it that, but at the very least it was a slowdown) was at the end of 2000 and into 2001 and we were due for another one. It's as simple as that.

There were a number of factors that contributed to the timing, but then there are always a number of factors that contribute to the timing.
The U.S. economy shrank in three non-consecutive quarters in the early 2000s (the third quarter of 2000, the first quarter of 2001, and the third quarter of 2001). Strictly speaking, the U.S. economy was not in recession during this period -- the common definition being "a fall of a country's real gross domestic product in two or more successive quarters."

Those using less traditional definitions of the term deem part or all of this period to have been a recession and there remains some debate over the start and end dates. The initial report by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) declares a recession that lasted from March 2001 to November 2001 (Someone add an application of an AD-AS model for ECO 202), as real gross domestic product dropped during this period by 0.2% total from the fourth quarter of 2000. However, even this definition is in doubt. Several members of NBER's business cycle dating committee have said that revised data indicates a recession actually began some time within the final months of 2000. Committee members suggest they are inclined to move the date.[1] NBER President Martin Feldstein said:

"It is clear that the revised data have made our original March date for the start of the recession much too late. We are still waiting for additional monthly data before making a final judgment. Until we have the additional data, we cannot make a decision."[1]
Controversy over the precise dates of the recession led to the characterization of the recession as the Clinton Recession by Republicans, if it could be traced to the final term of President Bill Clinton. A move in the recession date in a 2004 report by the Council of Economic Advisors to several months before the one given by the NBER was seen as politically motivated.[2]

Using the stock market as a benchmark, a recession began in March 2000 when the NASDAQ crashed following the collapse of the Dot-com bubble. The Dow Jones Industrial Average was relatively unscathed by the NASDAQ's crash until the September 11, 2001 attacks, after which the DJIA suffered its worst one-day point loss and biggest one-week losses in history. The market rebounded, only to crash once more in the final two quarters of 2002. In the final three quarters of 2003, the market finally rebounded permanently, agreeing with the unemployment statistics that the recession lasted from 2001 through 2003.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_2000s_recession
 
Last edited:
  • #22
Ivan Seeking said:
As for manufacturing: Death and destruction. For example, not long ago I was proud to have played a key role in developing a fantastic new American product - molecular oriented pvc. Almost as soon as we finished, the product rights and company were sold to a company in China.

Astronuc said:
Um China does buy from us. They buy coal, scrap metal, and other raw materials. Then they make products and sell them to the US at a significant multiple of what they buy.

Are you saying that Ivan's company developed a fantastic new raw material?
 
  • #23
No it means capitalism works - the directors of Ivan's company decided that they could make more money for their shareholders by selling the company/invention/rights to the Chinese company than they could from manufacturing the product themselve.
They gave the money to the shareholders who then had the choice to invest it however they wanted.
To have done anything different would have been illegal.
 
  • #24
Much of Maine's economy is tied to the timber industry, and with paper prices and lumber prices being eroded due to foreign competition (thanks again for NAFTA, Bill!) paper mills are shutting down, saw mills are shutting down, and the people who own timberland and who once worked to cut, yard, haul, and stockpile timber for the mills are looking for work, just as fuel prices and food prices are spiking. Lumberyards are desperate to sell inventory, but with the collapse of the housing market, there is precious little new construction. My niece's husband and his brothers normally build houses under contract, but unless they want to go out on a limb and build houses on spec (risky in this market) they instead have to rely on smaller remodeling/repair jobs to put food on the table. Bush may not see a recession yet, but that's because he never ventures farther north than Kennebunkport.
 
Last edited:
  • #25
jimmysnyder said:
Are you saying that Ivan's company developed a fantastic new raw material?
Nope. With the cash the Chinese collect from the US, they simply buy up the technology at bargain prices.

There is a fair amount of technology transfer between the US and China (and it's essentially oneway to China). It save the Chinese years of R&D - and that is a real bargain.
 
  • #26
Astronuc said:
Nope. With the cash the Chinese collect from the US, they simply buy up the technology at bargain prices.
How do you know the Chinese didn't overpay?

Astronuc said:
There is a fair amount of technology transfer between the US and China (and it's essentially oneway to China). It save the Chinese years of R&D - and that is a real bargain.
So you don't want them buying our raw materials and you don't want them buying our technology. What are they allowed to buy?
 
  • #27
jimmysnyder said:
How do you know the Chinese didn't overpay?
Because I know some details not publicly available.

So you don't want them buying our raw materials and you don't want them buying our technology. What are they allowed to buy?
Not at all. But I'd prefer they buy finished products. The big problem with the current situation is the negative trade balance with about $60 billion leaving the US every month (not only to China).
 
Last edited:
  • #28
Astronuc said:
Not at all. But I'd prefer they buy finished products. The big problem with the current situation is the negative trade balance with about $60 billion leaving the US every month (not only to China).
That's the problem here with the Canadian lumber industry. With Canada's universal health-care, their lumber mills can offer competitive wages, buy our saw-logs, mill them into lumber, ship it back to Maine and undercut the prices of the Maine saw-mills. When we ship raw materials, and buy value-added finished products, there is a net flow of cash out of the country.
 
  • #29
We just had the second round of lay offs today. Thirty seconds ago. Safe again.
 
  • #30
tribdog said:
We just had the second round of lay offs today. Thirty seconds ago. Safe again.

Yikes! Wonder if they're done with them yet.

Are you looking now? Or do you think you'll just hunker down, lay low, and see if you'll be OK?

Probably not a bad time to at least update your resume, like chemisttree suggested.
 
  • #31
We are certainly seeing some cost cutting measures. In the last 6 months we have had our yearly vacation carry over limited to 80hrs, we have seen our profit sharing turn into a selective performance bonus, our retirement funds have been frozen, we are losing our weekend pay bonus (5% pay loss for me, 10% for the other night shift). Now we are told that because of the 10% pay cut by the other shift we will have to change our work schedule to cover one of the weekend nights they have been working. So now every other weekend I will work Saturday and Sunday nights.

Historically this has been considered one of the best high tech companies to work for due to the excellent worker environment, it is gone. Oh yeah, you may have heard of the company, HP.

Bill and Dave and all that they stood for is dead. :cry:
 
  • #32
lisab said:
Yikes! Wonder if they're done with them yet.

Are you looking now? Or do you think you'll just hunker down, lay low, and see if you'll be OK?

Probably not a bad time to at least update your resume, like chemisttree suggested.

I sat down with the owner of the company yesterday and we discussed this. I promised I won't abandon him and he promised he won't lay me off. Unless the company folds.
 
  • #33
I work for a utility that is going down the tubes, mostly due to a hostile regulatory environment.

It is so bad the company is selling off more than half of the business (gas) to a privately held company. This is not directly related to the reccession, but it impacts every one here. The cause is increased fuel costs, such that every residential kWh we sell loses us about 1.1 cents. We sell ~1500 megawatts/hour, of that about 300 MW is residential.
40 million dollar loss every month. WE have to try to cover that with bulk power sales.

And up until 6 months ago our residential customer base was growing by 20000 homes/ year. At least it has slowed a lot now.

About 50% of us will be going to the new gas company - the remaining bodies here will go thru a layoff of 350 out of the 1100 remaining positions. So, we go from 3100 employees to 750 in one year.
 

1. What is the definition of a recession?

A recession is a significant decline in economic activity that lasts for an extended period of time. It is characterized by a decrease in gross domestic product (GDP), income, employment, and trade, and is typically accompanied by a rise in unemployment and a decrease in consumer spending.

2. How does a recession affect individuals?

A recession can have a significant impact on individuals, as it often leads to job losses, reduced income, and a decrease in the value of assets such as homes and investments. This can result in financial hardship, increased stress, and a decrease in overall quality of life.

3. What are the causes of a recession?

The exact causes of a recession can vary, but they often include a combination of factors such as a decrease in consumer spending, a decline in business investment, and a decrease in government spending. Other factors that can contribute to a recession include high levels of debt, inflation, and economic shocks such as natural disasters or political instability.

4. How long do recessions typically last?

The duration of a recession can vary, but on average, they tend to last around 11 months. However, some recessions can be shorter or longer, depending on the severity of the economic downturn and the effectiveness of government intervention measures.

5. What can be done to mitigate the effects of a recession?

Governments and central banks often implement various measures to try to mitigate the effects of a recession, such as lowering interest rates, increasing government spending, and implementing policies to stimulate economic growth. Individuals can also take steps to protect themselves during a recession, such as reducing unnecessary expenses, diversifying their investments, and building an emergency fund.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
6
Views
787
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
55
Views
11K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
50
Views
7K
  • General Discussion
Replies
27
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
33
Views
1K
Back
Top