Anyone else see the new Mad Max?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jimster41
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Max
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers around the film "Mad Max: Fury Road," with participants praising its high-octane action and artistic direction. Many agree that Charlize Theron, portraying Furiosa, delivers a standout performance, often overshadowing Tom Hardy's Max. The film is characterized by stunning cinematography and immersive storytelling, despite some critiques regarding its plot depth. Overall, it is recommended as a must-see in theaters, particularly in 3D for the full experience.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of film genres, particularly action and post-apocalyptic themes.
  • Familiarity with cinematic techniques such as CGI and cinematography.
  • Knowledge of character development and ensemble casts in film.
  • Awareness of the "Manic Pixie Dream Girl" trope in storytelling.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the cinematographic techniques used in "Mad Max: Fury Road."
  • Explore the character dynamics and themes in post-apocalyptic films.
  • Learn about George Miller's filmography and his impact on the action genre.
  • Investigate the use of CGI in modern cinema and its evolution over time.
USEFUL FOR

Film enthusiasts, action movie fans, cinematographers, and anyone interested in character-driven storytelling in cinema.

  • #31
DavidSnider said:
I saw this movie in IMAX 3D and I found it really entertaining, even if a bit thin on plot. I'm not sure I'd really want to watch it outside of a theater though. It's like a post apocalyptic cirque du soleil.

One of my favorite reviews about this movie had the realization that Mad Max's character was playing the role of the "Manic Pixie Dream Girl" trope in his own movie. It's so true, but it worked well.

Had to wiki that but, I agree. And the idea seems post apocalyptically...apropos?

I saw an interview w/George Miller. I guess he's got two more.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
WOW ---- it must be a generational thing. That movie was the biggest DUD I've seen in a long time. No Plot, no character, no theme. Just a 95% car chase fight scene movie. (Yes, easily 95%).

Sure, the CGI technology and 3D were spectacular. But the totally contrived, impractical, weapons and devices were laughable and really hard to get past. The high speed fight scenes just went ON and ON and ON and ON and ON and ON and On and ... - No Lie, 95% of the movie was car chase battle scenes. The bad guys can't shoot, can't fight, and the good guys can't miss. Sheesh ---

I have no idea how anyone thought anybody "dominated" as a character since there was nothing like any character development.

It had no soul. It'll be even more boring when it hits TV.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phion
  • #33
meBigGuy said:
But the totally contrived, impractical, weapons and devices were laughable and really hard to get past.

bhpNqLf.jpg


Looks fairly reasonable to me. I think you're right, it's a generational thing.
 
  • #34
DavidSnider said:
Looks fairly reasonable to me. I think you're right, it's a generational thing.

The guitar truck was my absolute favorite part! It's not supposed to be realistic.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ryan_m_b
  • #35
I don't need or expect realistic (in fact I intentionally didn't use that word). This was WAY beyond unrealistic (try stupid). Guardians of the Galaxy was hardly realistic, for example, and I loved it. I just found Mad Max tiresome.
If it had been 25% chase battles and more drama, ... well, it wasn't, so that's that. I suppose I should have watch the trailer.

The film technology was impressive. If you are going to see it, see it in 3D in the theater.
 
  • #36
meBigGuy said:
I suppose I should have watch the trailer.

Or watch the original ones :smile:

This is one of those movies where you have to let yourself go. You can't analyze anything. Just sit back and enjoy the roller coaster.

meBigGuy said:
The film technology was impressive. If you are going to see it, see it in 3D in the theater.

I saw it in 2D. Most are saying stay away from the 3D because it wasn't shot in 3D
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ryan_m_b
  • #37
OH GOOD GRIEF !

Rotten Tomatoes now shows it as, based on a poll of critics, the 10th best move of all time. Now although I haven't seen it I expect it to be fun since I like movies where lots of things go boom, but seriously ... 10th best of all time? I just can't imaging that. I mean if you look at some of the movies that follow on their list, the idea that a road warrior movie could be better than them is laughable.
 
  • #38
Hey man that flaming guitar guy was totally plausible - he was just the analogue of the fife and drum, in the post industrial waste-land. :wink:

I thought the use of 3D was one of the selling points. It had a somewhat intentional, stage-set construction feel to it - very specifically applied. Like the guitar curtain on the crucial scene. I loved that, not because it was over the top, but because of the way it punctuated the scene just before, and suddenly made you aware of yourself sitting in the seat, watching a story. Very funny, but not ha ha funny.

There are all kinds of reasons not to like it (and everyone has their own taste), but as pure film craft assessment (which to my thinking needs to be genre neutral or genre-inclusive, and also agnostic with respect to many aspects of story and purpose) it was brilliantly made.

I can't stand Pulp-Fiction, or Reservoir Dogs, but I get why Quentin Terrentino is a film-making genius. Like-wise, Wes Andersen isn't going to be to everyone's taste, but he's also a master of the medium. I think these assessments represent the best self-awareness of the arts - how quality can be assessed across subjective experience. Oh, yeah, I can't stand any story about gangsters or mobsters, no matter how well the story is told. But I've seen The Godfather, and I agree it is brilliant.

This was very fine craft.
 
  • #39
It's good to see some comments that aren't extremely positive. I have never had such a strong negative reaction to a trailer as I had to this one, so all the positive comments made me feel like one of those Star Trek robots that started thinking about the liar paradox.
 
  • #40
meBigGuy said:
WOW ---- it must be a generational thing. That movie was the biggest DUD I've seen in a long time. No Plot, no character, no theme. Just a 95% car chase fight scene movie. (Yes, easily 95%).

Maybe it is just an expect-something-else thing. The trailer leave no doubt what kind of movie it is. Thus I switched my brain off and had a lot of fun.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ryan_m_b
  • #41
Fredrik said:
It's good to see some comments that aren't extremely positive. I have never had such a strong negative reaction to a trailer as I had to this one, so all the positive comments made me feel like one of those Star Trek robots that started thinking about the liar paradox.
I saw the trailer and thought it would be horrible. I was wrong. But I will admit, it's not for everyone.
 
  • #42
I was killing time waiting for a new muffler to get installed. Saw the Avengers Age of Ultron (which was pretty fun!) , but the car still wasn't done. So decided to check out Mad Max, which I had originally not been interested in seeing.

That's probably why I enjoyed it as much as I did. I had zero expectations.
 
  • #43
Greg Bernhardt said:
I saw the trailer and thought it would be horrible. I was wrong. But I will admit, it's not for everyone.
OK, that's interesting, as is your earlier comment about how you don't like The transformers or the Fast and Furious movies. That comment poked a hole in my theory that the only reason this movie is getting good reviews is that it has only been seen by Michael Bay fans and people who cheer out loud in the movie theater every time Vin Diesel or Paul Walker does something. And the comment you made now is an interesting contrast to the fact that in the extremely positive review that I quickly scrolled through today, the reviewer said that he had been looking forward to the movie for months, and had to restrain himself to not watch the trailers more than a few times per day.
 
  • #44
Greg Bernhardt said:
Or watch the original ones :smile:

I was fine with the originals, Mad Max, Road Warrior (the best), Thunderdome. A co worker saw it and said it was great, he was on the edge of his chair through the whole thing. I went with few, if any, expectations (people not liking movies because of expectations is a pet peeve of mine). I was just bored by the battles that others found exciting. Not sure why.
 
  • #45
GTOM said:
So it is true, that Max isn't even the main character. They should have been honest at least, and rename the fim...

I just saw it last night night in 3D, what a wild ride. Great CGI, they got the post-apocalyptic feel and colors just right. Great action. But the plot and character development, IMHO, were severely lacking. Maybe I was just a bit hypersensitive to this because I had high expectations considering RT 98% score, but I thought they could have done better here.

Clearly Charlize was the main character, but it was awkward because it seemed as they felt obliged to force some kind of a main character role on Max. Who in my opinion, was a hollow character. We really had no history of him other than him being "haunted by the faces of those he couldn't save." That wasn't really compelling nor was the fact that Charlize had no history we could bite on either.

But perhaps the thing that irritated me the most was that these post-apocalyptic "mortal" humans somehow had no need of either food nor drink, except for the occasional beetle or lizard. That wouldn't seem to add up to the calories needed for such a high octane existence. The most absurd comment in the movie, however, was when the main evil guy said "Don't get too hooked on water." Really? You're going to say this to thousands of mortal human beings in the desert? I don't care if this is the movies, this is portrayed as post-apocalyptic real human-like situation, not complete fantasy. I think they could have done better in that respect.
 
  • #47
I finally saw it. The two long action scenes were intense, but far too long. I was already sick of them a few minutes into the second one, and just wanted the movie to end. The characters were paper thin. Their vehicles and their society didn't make much sense. I realize that we're supposed to ignore that last part and just enjoy the ride, but I wasn't quite able to. All things considered, I'd say that it was watchable, but not more than that. The 8.6 at IMDb, the 89/100 at metacritic.com, and the mind-boggling 98% at rottentomatoes.com still don't make sense to me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
866
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
12K