Anyone here also a member at SciForums.com?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Member
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a science forum, with participants expressing mixed feelings about its content and community. One user questions the relevance of science fiction within a science-focused platform, while others reminisce about past experiences with similar forums, noting a decline in activity and quality over the years. A specific user, Archie Plutonium, is mentioned as having negatively impacted the signal-to-noise ratio in discussions on physics forums. The conversation also touches on technical issues with account access, with one user reporting being locked out due to a contact info change. Overall, the thread highlights nostalgia for earlier forum dynamics and concerns about current engagement levels.
DaveC426913
Gold Member
Messages
23,830
Reaction score
7,814
If so, I'd like to beg a favour.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DaveC426913 said:
If so, I'd like to beg a favour.
Not really into sci fi Dave. Some good films here and there.
Is this a good site? Discussing films and stuff?
 
pinball1970 said:
Not really into sci fi Dave. Some good films here and there.
Is this a good site? Discussing films and stuff?
It's a science forum.

OK, that's a bit of a stretch.
It ... uses the word 'science' a lot.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, russ_watters and berkeman
DaveC426913 said:
It's a science forum.

OK, that's a bit of a stretch.
It ... uses the word 'science' a lot.
Why would I be into sci fi if like science? Does it follow I like meta physics because I use physics in my job?
 
pinball1970 said:
Does it follow I like meta physics because I use physics in my job?
Or Meta, or Threads... There's a whole new rabbit hole... :wink:
 
DaveC426913 said:
If so, I'd like to beg a favour.
I think I still am. What's up? Pm if you prefer...
 
russ_watters said:
I think I still am. What's up? Pm if you prefer...
I changed my contact info, and the auto-confirm is busted so I've been locked out for a week.

But it looks like the Forumati just returned from vacation to save the day. So all may be well.

Tx .I'll keep you apprised.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
I used to frequent sci.math a while back. Signal-to-noise became way low, I haven't been back in years.
This guy, Archie Plutonium, almost ruined it single-handedly.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and berkeman
DaveC426913 said:
I changed my contact info, and the auto-confirm is busted so I've been locked out for a week.

But it looks like the Forumati just returned from vacation to save the day. So all may be well.

Tx .I'll keep you apprised.
I am a member there too.
 
  • Like
Likes DaveC426913
  • #10
Inlik
DaveC426913 said:
It's a science forum.

OK, that's a bit of a stretch.
It ... uses the word 'science' a lot.
Apologies I misread your post. No one actually mentioned sci fi except me!
I checked out the site and joined just to see, I am not on any other forums. Not active anyway.
 
  • #11
pinball1970 said:
Inlik

... joined just to see...
Oh God why...
 
  • #12
I remember when PF and SciForums were running neck and neck. But that was almost 20 years ago. I hadn't looked at SF for a long time and I know it was really bad there the last time I looked. But the place is a morgue now. I logged in and saw 3 members online.
 
  • #13
Ivan Seeking said:
I remember when PF and SciForums were running neck and neck. But that was almost 20 years ago. I hadn't looked at SF for a long time and I know it was really bad there the last time I looked. But the place is a morgue now. I logged in and saw 3 members online.
Well that will go up by 33% if I ever get my login working.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Ivan Seeking and berkeman
  • #14
DaveC426913 said:
Well that will go up by 33% if I ever get my login working.
Will I tell James or Bells you are locked out?

I was going to reply to James quite soon anyway since he answered my question about Newtonian gravity a short while back.
 
  • #15
WWGD said:
This guy, Archie Plutonium, almost ruined it single-handedly.
Oh, @$#^$%#&^%!. Could that be one Archimedes Plutonium who vastly decreased the signal-to-noise ratio on sci.physics.* decades ago?

The more things change, the more... :oldfrown:
 
Last edited:
  • #16
strangerep said:
Oh, @$#^$%#&^%!. Could that be one Archimedes Plutonium who vastly decreased the signal-to-noise ration on sci.physics.* decades ago?

The more things change, the more... :oldfrown:
Precisely. A potent mix of stupid, nasty and aggressive. Edit:Still today, I keep a dark place in my heart for him.
Edit: Well, that came of too strong. Just brought up some bad memories.
 
Last edited:
  • Wow
Likes pinball1970
  • #17
Yes, his biography won't reply when I call him a moron.
 
  • #18
geordief said:
Will I tell James or Bells you are locked out?

I was going to reply to James quite soon anyway since he answered my question about Newtonian gravity a short while back.
Actually, that would be great.

Since I started this thread I've heard back from the site owner (Sasa) but it can't hurt to give James a heads up so he doesn't think I've had a stronk.

Thanks.
 
  • #19
DaveC426913 said:
Oh God why...
Curious. I'll check it out in the week.
 
  • #20
DaveC426913 said:
so he doesn't think I've had a stronk
Ouch, that sounds painful... :wink:
 
  • #21
strangerep said:
Oh, @$#^$%#&^%!. Could that be one Archimedes Plutonium who vastly decreased the signal-to-noise ration on sci.physics.* decades ago?
Also known as Archie-Pu. (pronounced as "poo") :wink:
 
  • #22
The Forumati came to the rescue, and my access is restored. Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters

Similar threads

Back
Top