AP Physics C: Karate Expert's Board Chop Calculation

  • Thread starter Thread starter CoreanJesus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ap Physic
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a karate expert breaking a pine board. The key variables include the board's thickness of 2.2 cm, the mass of the hand at 580 g, and the hand's striking speed of 9.5 m/s, which comes to rest 2.8 cm below the board's top. Participants are calculating the time duration of the chop and the average force applied, using the equations of motion and Newton's second law. A point of confusion arises regarding the displacement used in calculations, specifically whether to include the board's thickness in the total distance. Clarification is sought on why only the 2.8 cm is considered for delta y in the velocity-acceleration function.
CoreanJesus
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known
A karate expert breaks a pine board, 2.2 cm thick, with a hand chop. Strobe
photography shows that his hand, whose mass may be taken as 580 g, strikes the
top of the board with a speed of 9.5 m/s and comes to rest 2.8 cm below this level.
(a) Calculate the time duration of the chop (assuming a constant force). (b)
Calculate the average force applied.


Homework Equations


Velocity position accel. equation and F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution


So I know the answer and I've solved it. But I don't understand for part a why you would use just .028m instead of .022+.028 for the delta y in your velocity accel. Poston function.[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem literally states that the 2.8 cm are relative to the top of the board.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?