AP physics 2: Phase change in thin film interference

  • Thread starter Thread starter AAONA
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
When light reflects off a boundary from a medium of lower refractive index to a higher one, a 180° phase change occurs. In this scenario, light travels from air to the first layer (n₁ = 1.404) and then reflects off the glass (n_glass = 1.62). The reflection at the glass interface results in a 180° phase change, while the transition from air to the first layer does not induce a phase change. Therefore, the total phase change for light reflecting from the glass is 180°. The confusion arises from not accounting for the direction of light travel and the phase changes at each interface correctly.
AAONA
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Phase change in thin film interference
Relevant Equations
2t=. 5m/wavelength

180° phase change if n2>n1
47. Two thin layers of material with different indices of refraction are coated on a glass plate. The outer first material has n₁ = 1.404, the inner second material has n₂ = 1.531, and the glass has glass = 1.62. If light is incident from air on the first layer, what is the phase change for light that reflects from the glass?

a. 0°

b. 180°

c. 360°

d. 540°

Apparently the answer is 180, but I don't get it. I assumed since it's low n» high» higher > two consecutive 180° phase changes since moving to a denser meduim produces a 180° phase change, so 360° which is equivalent to zero.


What am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The questions asks about the light reflected from the glass, so must traverse the layers in the opposite direction as well.
 
  • Like
Likes AAONA, SammyS and berkeman
Beams of electrons and protons move parallel to each other in the same direction. They ______. a. attract each other. b. repel each other. c. neither attract nor repel. d. the force of attraction or repulsion depends upon the speed of the beams. This is a previous-year-question of CBSE Board 2023. The answer key marks (b) as the right option. I want to know why we are ignoring Coulomb's force?