Apparent Weight of Planet Problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the apparent weight of an astronaut on Planet X, which rotates similarly to Earth. The astronaut's weight varies between the north pole and the equator, prompting questions about gravitational acceleration and the planet's rotational period. Participants are exploring the implications of the given weights and the distance from the north pole to the equator.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of gravitational acceleration at different points on Planet X and the implications for determining the planet's rotation period. There are attempts to derive the radius of the planet based on the distance from the north pole to the equator, with some questioning the values used in calculations. Others explore the relationship between the astronaut's weight and the mass of the planet.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance and questioning each other's assumptions. There is a recognition of potential errors in calculations, particularly regarding the radius and mass of the planet, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach or values.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of explicit information regarding the radius of Planet X, which affects their calculations. There is also a concern about the mass of the planet in relation to its gravitational effects on the astronaut.

anubis01
Messages
149
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Planet X rotates in the same manner as the earth, around an axis through its north and south poles, and is perfectly spherical. An astronaut who weighs 950.0 N on the Earth weighs 919.0 N at the north pole of Planet X and only 855.0 N at its equator. The distance from the north pole to the equator is 1.889×104 Km, measured along the surface of Planet X.


Homework Equations


g=g0-(v2/r)
w=mg
v=sqrt(gxpole-gxequatorxrx)

The Attempt at a Solution



a)How long is the day on Planet X?

Okay so first we need the mass of the astronaught which is we/ge=96.44 Kg. We can then use this to calculate gxequator and gxpole which equal 9.48 m/s^2 and 8.82 m/s^2 respectivly. using the formula g=g0-(v2/r) we can rearrange and solve for v. v=sqrt(gxpole-gxequator*rx) and I get a value of 3530.92 m/s. since v=2pir/T we rearange for T and I get a value of 33614.3 s. Now the answer is incorrect Could anyone please help determine what I'm missing from this question. As always any help is much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi anubis01,

anubis01 said:

Homework Statement


Planet X rotates in the same manner as the earth, around an axis through its north and south poles, and is perfectly spherical. An astronaut who weighs 950.0 N on the Earth weighs 919.0 N at the north pole of Planet X and only 855.0 N at its equator. The distance from the north pole to the equator is 1.889×104 Km, measured along the surface of Planet X.


Homework Equations


g=g0-(v2/r)
w=mg
v=sqrt(gxpole-gxequatorxrx)

The Attempt at a Solution



a)How long is the day on Planet X?

Okay so first we need the mass of the astronaught which is we/ge=96.44 Kg. We can then use this to calculate gxequator and gxpole which equal 9.48 m/s^2 and 8.82 m/s^2 respectivly. using the formula g=g0-(v2/r) we can rearrange and solve for v. v=sqrt(gxpole-gxequator*rx) and I get a value of 3530.92 m/s.

I can't be sure without seeing the numbers you used, but I believe you used the wrong r value here. (Notice in the original problem they did not give you the radius of the planet.)
 
alphysicist said:
Hi anubis01,

I can't be sure without seeing the numbers you used, but I believe you used the wrong r value here. (Notice in the original problem they did not give you the radius of the planet.)

The value that I Used for my r was 1.889x107m and I assumed that I could just use that value given the wording of the question. Okay so looking at the wording more closely were given a quater the distance around the planet, this is 1/4 the circumference so c=7.556x107. c=pi*2r. r=(c-pi)/2. r=3.778x107. Would this line of thinking be correct or am I still mistaken?
 
anubis01 said:
The value that I Used for my r was 1.889x107m and I assumed that I could just use that value given the wording of the question. Okay so looking at the wording more closely were given a quater the distance around the planet, this is 1/4 the circumference so c=7.556x107. c=pi*2r. r=(c-pi)/2. r=3.778x107. Would this line of thinking be correct or am I still mistaken?

Your line of thinking is right, but:

[tex] c= 2 \pi r \longrightarrow r = \frac{c}{2 \pi}[/tex]
 
alphysicist said:
Your line of thinking is right, but:

[tex] c= 2 \pi r \longrightarrow r = \frac{c}{2 \pi}[/tex]
sigh, silly mistakes are going to be the death of me. Thank you very much for all the help sir, your a life saver.
 
Okay I got the answer for part a but I'm not sure about part b. which asks

If a 4.400×104Kg satellite is placed in a circular orbit 3000 Km above the surface of Planet X, what will be its orbital period?
alright since we know the velocity of the planet and its period we can use that to calculate the the mass of said planet which I got to be 1.4315*10^24 Kg.

Then using the the formula T=2pir2/3/sqrt(Gmplanet) I got the period to be 0.0392. Is this line of thing correct or am I missing something.
 
anubis01 said:
Okay I got the answer for part a but I'm not sure about part b. which asks

If a 4.400×104Kg satellite is placed in a circular orbit 3000 Km above the surface of Planet X, what will be its orbital period?
alright since we know the velocity of the planet and its period we can use that to calculate the the mass of said planet which I got to be 1.4315*10^24 Kg.

I don't think this mass is correct; can you show how you got it?
 
alphysicist said:
I don't think this mass is correct; can you show how you got it?

I calculated the mass using the velocity of the planet which was found in the last part of the question v=2817.267m/s I used the formula (v^2*rplanet)/G=Mplanet
Mplanet=(2817.267^2*1.203x10^7)/6.67x10^-11=1.4315x10^24 Kg

I then used the formula T=2pir2/3/sqrt(Gmplanet) to find the orbital period of the satellite plugging in the values. T=(2pi(1.203X10^7+3x10^6)2/3)/sqrt(6.67x10^-11x1.4315x10^24)=0.0392 s
 
anubis01 said:
I calculated the mass using the velocity of the planet which was found in the last part of the question v=2817.267m/s I used the formula (v^2*rplanet)/G=Mplanet
Mplanet=(2817.267^2*1.203x10^7)/6.67x10^-11=1.4315x10^24 Kg

I then used the formula T=2pir2/3/sqrt(Gmplanet) to find the orbital period of the satellite plugging in the values. T=(2pi(1.203X10^7+3x10^6)2/3)/sqrt(6.67x10^-11x1.4315x10^24)=0.0392 s

That V is the rotation of the planet, not something that is in orbit around the planet.

You would do better to use the Astronaut's weight at the pole to figure GM.
 
  • #10
LowlyPion said:
That V is the rotation of the planet, not something that is in orbit around the planet.

You would do better to use the Astronaut's weight at the pole to figure GM.

when I use the astronaughts weight at the pole I get following mass.

Fg=(Gmplanetmastronaught)/rp2
mplanet=(fg*rp2)/(G*mastronaught)
mplanet=(919*(1.203x107)2)/(6.67x10-11x84.6)
mplanet=2.356x1025Kg

I don't think the mass is right because the planet shouldn't have a heavier mass than the Earth and yet exert a smaller fg on the astronaught.
 
  • #11
anubis01 said:
when I use the astronaughts weight at the pole I get following mass.

Fg=(Gmplanetmastronaught)/rp2
mplanet=(fg*rp2)/(G*mastronaught)
mplanet=(919*(1.203x107)2)/(6.67x10-11x84.6)
mplanet=2.356x1025Kg

I don't think the mass is right because the planet shouldn't have a heavier mass than the Earth and yet exert a smaller fg on the astronaught.

It's not just the mass of the planet that effects fg, it's also the radius of the planet; and this planet is larger than the earth.
 
  • #12
Ah I got it now, thank you both for all the help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K