MHB Application of existence and uniqueness theorem

find_the_fun
Messages
147
Reaction score
0
Given the differential equation [math]y'=4x^3y^3[/math] with initial condition [math]y(1)=0[/math]determine what the existence and uniqueness theorem can conclude about the IVP.

I know the Existence and Uniquness theorem has two parts 1)check to see if the function is differentiable and 2)check to see if $$\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}$$ is continious. If they both are true you can condlude there is only one solution (a unique solution). If not, then you can't conclude anything.

My problem is I don't understand which function I should be checking. Should I be checking the differential equation it self, or do I first need to solve and and then check the (a) solution?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
find_the_fun said:
Given the differential equation [math]y'=4x^3y^3[/math] with initial condition [math]y(1)=0[/math]determine what the existence and uniqueness theorem can conclude about the IVP.

I know the Existence and Uniquness theorem has two parts 1)check to see if the function is differentiable and 2)check to see if $$\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}$$ is continious. If they both are true you can condlude there is only one solution (a unique solution). If not, then you can't conclude anything.

My problem is I don't understand which function I should be checking. Should I be checking the differential equation it self, or do I first need to solve and and then check the (a) solution?

The initial value problem is of the form:

$$\left\{\begin{matrix}
y'=f(x,y)\\
\\
y(x_0)=y_0
\end{matrix}\right.$$

Therefore, the function $f$ is equal to $4x^3y^3$.
 
I have the equation ##F^x=m\frac {d}{dt}(\gamma v^x)##, where ##\gamma## is the Lorentz factor, and ##x## is a superscript, not an exponent. In my textbook the solution is given as ##\frac {F^x}{m}t=\frac {v^x}{\sqrt {1-v^{x^2}/c^2}}##. What bothers me is, when I separate the variables I get ##\frac {F^x}{m}dt=d(\gamma v^x)##. Can I simply consider ##d(\gamma v^x)## the variable of integration without any further considerations? Can I simply make the substitution ##\gamma v^x = u## and then...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
434
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K