Arbitrary array of numbers, proof

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a square array of numbers from 1 to 25 arranged in a 5x5 format. The task is to prove that the least of the greatest numbers in each row, denoted as s, is greater than or equal to the greatest of the least numbers in each column, denoted as t, for any arrangement of the numbers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the possibility of proving the statement by assuming the opposite (t > s) and exploring the implications of that assumption.
  • Questions arise about the relationships between the numbers in the same row as s and their implications for the value of t.
  • Some participants clarify the definitions of s and t in terms of the maximums and minimums of the rows and columns, respectively.
  • There is a focus on deriving contradictions from the assumption that s < t.

Discussion Status

The discussion has progressed towards exploring logical contradictions arising from the assumption that s is less than t. Participants have provided insights that help clarify the relationships between the elements of the array and their respective roles in the proof.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information available for the proof and the methods they can use to explore the problem.

Daltohn
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The numbers 1 to 25 are arranged in a square array of five rows and five columns in an arbitrary way. The greatest number in each row is determined, and then the least number of these five is taken; call that number s. Next, the least number in each column is determined, and then the greatest number of these five is taken; this number is called t.
Prove that s is equal to or greater than t for all possible arrangements.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I see intuitively that this is the case but have no idea where to start with a proof.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about reversing the problem ? assume t > s and show that it leads to a contradiction ...
 
Suppose it is false, i.e. s<t. What can you say about other numbers in the same row as s?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
haruspex said:
Suppose it is false, i.e. s<t. What can you say about other numbers in the same row as s?
I don't know except that they're all less than s. What more can I deduce assuming s<t?
 
s is the least of the biggers and t is the greatest of the smallers, right?
Say, ## s = \min( s_1, s_2, s_3, s_4, s_5) ## where ##s_n ## denotes the largest member in row n.
Similarly, ## t= \max( t_1, t_2, t_3, t_4, t_5) ## where ##t_m ## denotes the smallest member in column m.
You know something about row n where ##s = s_n##.
Daltohn said:
I don't know except that they're all less than s.
Use this knowledge to contradict the assumption that s<t.
Each of the t_m terms are the minimums from their columns.
 
Okay, I'm an idiot...

Suppose s<t. Then t is not in the same row as s since none of its members is greater than s. But then t can never be the least in its column since every column has a member that is less than or equal to s. However, t is by definition the least in its column. Contradiction. Hence s is greater than or equal to t.

Something like that? Maybe the contradiction is that t both is and isn't a member of the same row as s.
 
You've got it. The best you can hope for is t=s.
 
Yep, thank you all :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
12K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
13K