Archimedean property for unbounded sets

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter torquerotates
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Property Sets
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Archimedean property applies to unbounded sets, specifically real numbers and rational numbers, which both satisfy this property despite the latter not adhering to the Axiom of Completeness. The discussion highlights that while the Archimedean property relies on the existence of upper bounds, unbounded sets can still exhibit this property. The proof of the Archimedean property is contingent upon the context of the elements being discussed, particularly in relation to their completeness.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Archimedean property in mathematics
  • Familiarity with real numbers and rational numbers
  • Knowledge of the Axiom of Completeness
  • Basic concepts of supremum (sup) in set theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Archimedean property in different number systems
  • Study the Axiom of Completeness and its role in real analysis
  • Explore proofs of the Archimedean property for various sets
  • Investigate the relationship between boundedness and the existence of suprema
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of real analysis, and anyone interested in the properties of number sets and their completeness.

torquerotates
Messages
207
Reaction score
0
Does the Archimedean property work for unbounded sets? My book does a proof of the Archimedean property relying on the existence of sup which relies on the existence of a bound.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
torquerotates said:
Does the Archimedean property work for unbounded sets? My book does a proof of the Archimedean property relying on the existence of sup which relies on the existence of a bound.

Unbounded sets of what type of elements? Real numbers? I think you should reword or provide more details of your question and maybe even cite the text you're referring to (including page number, theorem number, etc.).
 
The real numbers are unbounded and have the Archimedean property.
 
If I'm recalling the proof of the Archimedean property correctly, I wonder if the OP actually meant to ask if this property holds true for sets that do not satisfy the Axiom of Completeness (i.e., the existence of sups)...

I suppose the rational numbers are an example of a set that satisfies the Archimedean property without satisfying the Axiom of Completeness.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K