Archimedes Principle to determine height of continental crust

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around using Archimedes' Principle to calculate the thickness of the continental crust beneath a coastal geographical point, specifically in the context of an introductory geology course. Participants explore the application of this principle to a problem involving various densities and depths, while also addressing the challenges of understanding the relevant mathematics.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about how to apply Archimedes' Principle to calculate the thickness of the continental crust, noting the lack of formulas in course material.
  • Another participant suggests considering a volume of 1m x 1m x height to analyze the equilibrium between the continental crust and the oceanic crust, emphasizing the importance of displacement.
  • A different participant provides a formula for buoyant force and weight equilibrium, indicating that the continental crust is less dense than the mantle, which affects the calculations.
  • One participant shares their own struggle with the same problem, seeking guidance from others in the thread.
  • Another participant offers a detailed equation and rearrangement steps to solve the problem, clarifying that certain variables can be disregarded under the assumption of sea level.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to solve the problem, with multiple viewpoints and methods presented. Some participants express confusion and seek clarification, while others provide differing equations and interpretations of Archimedes' Principle.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about sea level and the neglect of certain variables in the calculations. Additionally, the participants do not fully resolve the mathematical steps involved in applying Archimedes' Principle to this specific geological context.

kmam
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm taking an introductory geology class and am having big trouble with the math questions, as it's been many many years since I last took math classes.
I am to use Archimedes Principle to calculate the thickness of continental crust beneath a certain coastal geographical point (at sea level and not accounting for post glacial rebound effects).

Data given:
Water depth to the abyssal plain: 5000m
Thickness of abyssal oceanic crust: 10000m
Density of continental crust: 2800 kg/m3
Density of oceanic crust: 3000 kg/m3
Density of mantle: 3300 kg/m3
Density of water: 1000 kg/m3

Our course material does not include any formula for Archimedes Principle, just a brief description of how it works. So, I've googled to find a formula, but really am having a hard time understanding what it is I'm looking at. I have the basic formula, but I'm not seeing how I should use it to get what I need: Apparent immersed weight=weight-weight of displaced fluid.

I understand that the fluid here is the mantle, with density given for it, and of course the cont. crust density appears relevant, but that's about as far as I can get with this! And I don't understand why there is data for oceanic crust, water depth and density of water...

I'm assuming there are some other formulas involved in this calculation. I know thickness can be calculated from Volume=height*length*width. But nothing in the data seems to hint at length or width...?? aaah, this is so confusing, I don't know where to begin even. Any hints or tips will be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why not take a volume which is 1m x 1m x height in metres? I'm guessing you should consider that floating on magma is a column of continent, and alongside that is a column of ocean and sea floor. If these columns were not displacing the same weight of magma, then one would sink and the other rise until equilibrium was achieved. Or something like that.
 
well it's not clear for me but i'll try to help:
the one u’ve found(immersed weight=weight-weight of displaced fluid) is used in case the body is not floating totally immersed well it’s not the case because
density of the body(continental crust: 2800 kg/m3) less than that of the fluid(mantle: 3300 kg/m3)
so in that case the right one is: Fg = Fp weight of floating body (↓) = boyant force (↑)
thickness means height so try using this:
Fg = Fp
rs g Vs = rl g Vi ……………….. V=Ah
rs g As hs = rl g Ai hi …………..As=Ai
rs g hs = rl g hi

where: - rs density of the floating body ( ~ continental crust)
- g accn due to gravity (9.8)
- Vs volume of floating body ( ~ continental crust) As its area hs its height
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- rl density of the liquid where the body floats
- Vi the volume under water of the water(~mantle)

Try , ask , and please explain more the question,I no nothing about geology
 
did you get to know how to solve the problem Kmam? I am doing the same course now and got stuck in the same question.
gunillaserin@hotmail.com
 
Hello. I am on the same course, and was searching for the answer to the same question. In case anyone else is looking for it in the future, here is a picture and the equation to use:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/8908063/equation.png
[mirror: http://i.imgur.com/q5Ejoqe.png]

Note, that in this particular quetsion, zh does not exist as we're assuming we're at sea level. So just remove zh from the equation all together and you'll be fine :)

You begin with the equation:

zc.ρc = zw.ρw + zo.ρo + [zc-(zh + zw + zo)].ρm

First, you rearrange the equation so that zc is on its left hand side as follows:

zc.ρc = zw.ρw + zo.ρo + zc.ρm -(zh + zw + zo).ρm
zc.ρc - zc.ρm = zw.ρw + zo.ρo -(zh + zw + zo).ρm
zc.[ρc - ρm] = zw.ρw + zo.ρo -(zh + zw + zo).ρm
zc = [zw.ρw + zo.ρo -(zh + zw + zo).ρm]/[ρc - ρm]

Then you subsitute the values you were given for thickness and density.

Then you solve the equation!

Cheers!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
12K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
799
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K