Are all selfadjoint operators in quantum mechanics bounded?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of self-adjoint operators in quantum mechanics, particularly focusing on whether the equality of expectation values for two operators implies their equivalence. The scope includes theoretical aspects of operator theory and its implications in quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if the statement "if the expectation values of two operators are equal for all states, then the operators are equal" is true, seeking counterexamples if false.
  • Another participant suggests that operators with odd parity yield zero expectation values for any wave function, implying they do not necessarily lead to the conclusion of operator equality.
  • Some participants argue that if the expected value of the difference between two operators is zero for all states, it leads to the conclusion that the difference must be a zero operator, provided both operators are bounded.
  • However, a counterpoint is raised that the conclusion does not hold if either operator is unbounded, indicating a limitation in the argument.
  • A participant notes that the general solution to the equality of expectation values suggests that one operator may be an extension of the other, with equality requiring both operators to be bounded.
  • Another participant expresses uncertainty regarding the implications of unbounded operators, mentioning that the spectrum of operators is typically defined for bounded operators and that self-adjoint operators in quantum mechanics are expected to be bounded.
  • There is a recognition that bounded self-adjoint operators may not have eigenvalues, adding to the complexity of the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement on whether the equality of expectation values implies operator equality, particularly in the context of bounded versus unbounded operators. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing views presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations regarding the definitions and properties of bounded and unbounded operators, particularly in relation to their spectra and implications for self-adjointness.

hitche
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'd like to know if the following statement is true:
Let [itex]\hat{A}, \hat{B}[/itex] be operators for any two observables [itex]A, B[/itex]. Then [itex]\langle \hat{A} \rangle_{\psi} = \langle \hat{B} \rangle_{\psi} \forall \psi[/itex] implies [itex]\hat{A} = \hat{B}[/itex].
Here, [itex]\langle \hat{A} \rangle_{\psi} = \int_\mathbb{R^3} d^3x \psi^* \hat{A} \psi[/itex] is standard definition of expectation value of an operator [itex]\hat{A}[/itex].
If this doesn't hold, could you provide any counterexample? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any two operators with odd parity would give zero for any wave function.
 
yes - because the expected value of A-B will be zero for all psi, then by taking psi to be A-B's eigenvector, you reached the conclusion that A-B has only zero eigenvalues, which means A-B must be a zero operator.
 
Of course, not. The general solution of [itex]\langle\psi, A\psi \rangle= \langle\psi, B\psi\rangle[/itex] is that either one is an extension of the other. Equality follows iff both operators are bounded. As a counterexample would be any symmetric operator which is not self-adjoint.
 
cattlecattle said:
yes - because the expected value of A-B will be zero for all psi, then by taking psi to be A-B's eigenvector, you reached the conclusion that A-B has only zero eigenvalues, which means A-B must be a zero operator.

Not that's wrong. If either A or B is unbounded then clearly your argument won't apply.
 
WannabeNewton said:
Not that's wrong. If either A or B is unbounded then clearly your argument won't apply.

sorry, I failed to see which step was not applicable due to unboundedness
 
cattlecattle said:
sorry, I failed to see which step was not applicable due to unboundedness

I'm new to the theory, but I think the reason is that spectrum of operator is defined for bounded operators. There exists also some extended definition of spectrum for unbounded operators, but it can be empty (unlike the spectrum of a bounded operator).
BUT I read that in quantum mechanics every observable is represented by selfadjoint linear operator and according to another resource every selfadjoint everywhere defined operator is bounded. On the other hand bounded self adjoint operator may have no eigenvalue. So.. I don't know!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K