Are Binomial Coefficients and Fibonacci Numbers Related?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ramsey2879
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 3K views
ramsey2879
Messages
841
Reaction score
3
I posted a bit about the characteristic value of a Fibonacci series without proof but nowI wonder about whether it could be valid. A remarkable result of it applies to the binominal coefficients. The sum of following Binominal coefficients times corresponing Fibonacci numbers are in them selves terms from the Fibonnacci series. In other words, each of the following sums is a Fibonacci number. "(n,i)" is used her to represent the the binominal coefficients

A. [tex]\sum_{i=0}^{n}F_{i-1}(n,i)[/tex]

B. [tex]\sum_{i=0}^{n}F_{i-2}(n,i)[/tex]

For intance;
[tex]F_{-1}*1 + F_{0}* 3 + F_{1}*3 + F_{2}*1 = F_{5}[/tex]

[tex]F_{-2}*1 + F_{-1}*3 + F_{0}*3 + F_{1}*1 = F_{4}[/tex]

[tex]F_{-1}*1 + F_{0}*4 + F{1}*6 + F_{2}*4 + F_{3}*1 = F_{7}[/tex]

I could go on but that in it self does not prove the result.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
loop quantum gravity said:
The only thing I can advise you is to check in Combinatorial Identities of John Riordan and another one by Henri Gould.

Thanks but I thought of a proof by Induction
To Prove

[tex]F_{x+2n) = \sum_{i=0}^{n}F_{x+i}nCi[/tex]

It is easily verified for n=1

If true for any positive n then it is true for n+1

[tex]F_{(x+2*(n+1))} = F_{(x+2n)} + F_{(x+2n+1)}[/tex]

=[tex]\sum_{i=0}^{n}F_{x+i}nCi + F_{x+1+i}nCi[/tex]

Combining like F terms and using (n+1)Ci = nC(i-1)+nCi gives the required result
 
ramsey2879 said:
I posted a bit about the characteristic value of a Fibonacci series without proof but nowI wonder about whether it could be valid. A remarkable result of it applies to the binominal coefficients. The sum of following Binominal coefficients times corresponing Fibonacci numbers are in them selves terms from the Fibonnacci series. In other words, each of the following sums is a Fibonacci number. "(n,i)" is used her to represent the the binominal coefficients

A. [tex]\sum_{i=0}^{n}F_{i-1}(n,i)[/tex]

B. [tex]\sum_{i=0}^{n}F_{i-2}(n,i)[/tex]

For intance;
[tex]F_{-1}*1 + F_{0}* 3 + F_{1}*3 + F_{2}*1 = F_{5}[/tex]

[tex]F_{-2}*1 + F_{-1}*3 + F_{0}*3 + F_{1}*1 = F_{4}[/tex]

[tex]F_{-1}*1 + F_{0}*4 + F{1}*6 + F_{2}*4 + F_{3}*1 = F_{7}[/tex]

I could go on but that in it self does not prove the result.

How about using Pascel's triangle.
 
Anyway, I don't think it should be hard to prove using induction given that Fibonacci series is defined recursively and polynomial multiplication can be done via convolution.