Are colors in astro photos 'real'?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the authenticity of colors in astrophotography, particularly regarding nebulae. While many colors in images are true representations of visible light, exposure times are long enough that the human eye cannot perceive these colors in real-time, often resulting in a grey appearance. Additionally, diffraction spikes seen in some images are genuine artifacts caused by telescope construction, specifically in Newtonian-type telescopes. False colors are commonly used in narrowband imaging, particularly in infrared (IR) and ultraviolet (UV) photography, which are beyond human visual capabilities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic spectrum, particularly visible light (400-780 nanometers)
  • Familiarity with astrophotography techniques, including long exposure and narrowband imaging
  • Knowledge of telescope types, specifically Newtonian telescopes and their optical characteristics
  • Basic skills in digital post-processing tools like Adobe Photoshop
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of narrowband imaging and its applications in astrophotography
  • Learn about the electromagnetic spectrum and its relevance to astronomical observations
  • Explore the effects of exposure time on color perception in astrophotography
  • Investigate the construction and optical design of various telescope types, focusing on diffraction artifacts
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy enthusiasts, astrophotographers, and educators interested in the science behind color representation in astronomical images.

Cyberspace
Messages
7
Reaction score
2
There are lots of amazing photographs of nebula around. The colors contribute greatly to their grandeur.
But if we were able to get near enough to a nebula to see it with the naked eye would it possesses the colors we see in published photographs taken by telescopes? Or are the colors in astro photos in some way artificial or exaggerated?

Similarly I note that some astro photos show effects similar to a photographers starlight filter - have these shafts of light been added for dramatic effect in digital post-processing (eg photoshop) or are they genuine artifacts, eg of the telescope optics?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Cyberspace said:
There are lots of amazing photographs of nebula around. The colors contribute greatly to their grandeur.
But if we were able to get near enough to a nebula to see it with the naked eye would it possesses the colors we see in published photographs taken by telescopes? Or are the colors in astro photos in some way artificial or exaggerated?
This depends greatly on the photo you're looking at, but in general the colours tend to be real - in the sense that they're not artificially added or altered (but not always, specifically in case of photos made in non-visible light, where the input has to be translated into visible output).
However, the exposure times are long, which means that you'll never see with a human eye the colours that you see on the photos. There's just not enough light reaching your unaided eye to activate the colour-sensitive cones, even when standing smack in the middle of a galaxy - best you can see of the Milky Way is a fuzzy grey band (its grey because rods in the eye are more sensitive to light, but perceive everything in the shades of grey).

Cyberspace said:
Similarly I note that some astro photos show effects similar to a photographers starlight filter - have these shafts of light been added for dramatic effect in digital post-processing (eg photoshop) or are they genuine artifacts, eg of the telescope optics?
Those are diffraction spikes due to telescope construction. Mostly caused by the struts holding the secondary mirror in e.g. Newtonian-type telescopes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Imager, russ_watters, davenn and 2 others
The short is yes, the long answer is sort of. Here is an explanation: http://hubblesite.org/gallery/behind_the_pictures/meaning_of_color/
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jeannie O, Cyberspace and 1oldman2
Bandersnatch - thanks for that very informative reply, answered my questions perfectly.
newjerseyrunner - thanks for the link, very useful too.

Cheers
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1oldman2 and newjerseyrunner
There was a long thread on exactly that some time back if you feel like a forum search
 
Cyberspace said:
There are lots of amazing photographs of nebula around. The colors contribute greatly to their grandeur.
But if we were able to get near enough to a nebula to see it with the naked eye would it possesses the colors we see in published photographs taken by telescopes? Or are the colors in astro photos in some way artificial or exaggerated?

If they are board spectrum visible light images, then they are likely true colour
eg this photo of the great Orion Nebula of mine ...

upload_2016-8-21_18-7-18.png
narrow band imaging in various wavelengths tend to be false colour eg this IR image of the Orion Nebula ...

m42-43_2m.jpg
Dave
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1oldman2 and phinds
It's generally a good idea to inform yourself about the whole range of the electromagnetic spectrum that telescopes can capture, which is much wider than what a human eye can see. Anything above or below the range of visible light wavelength (400-780 nanometres) is invisible to the naked eye.

Many space photographs employ false colors in IR or UV photos. We wouldn't be able to see those objects through the naked eye.

It's also important to take into account how many light/years they are away from us. Today, the furthest ones don't look like the light that reaches us or don't exist anymore.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1oldman2
davenn said:
this photo of the great Orion Nebula of mine ...
:thumbup::smile: How many stacks is this image made from ?
 
For one of my favorite photos I added the diffraction spikes by adding wires across the front of my scope (which doesn't have struts). It is basically a natural color image (I used hydrogen alpha for red).

Horsehead-HaRGB.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn and 1oldman2
  • #10
1oldman2 said:
:thumbup::smile: How many stacks is this image made from ?

15 from memory
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1oldman2
  • #11
russ_watters said:
For one of my favorite photos I added the diffraction spikes by adding wires across the front of my scope (which doesn't have struts). It is basically a natural color image (I used hydrogen alpha for red).

sweet shot, Russ ... I have imaged that region but not as well as you
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1oldman2 and russ_watters

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K