Are Courthouse Forums the Key to Protecting Our Constitutional Rights?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mugaliens
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of courthouse forums and their potential role in protecting constitutional rights. Participants explore the implications of using online platforms to track judicial actions and the administration of common law, while also expressing concerns about the erosion of rights by some judicial figures.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant argues that courthouse forums are an effective way to monitor the administration of common law and protect individual rights, emphasizing the importance of staying informed about judicial actions.
  • Concerns are raised about some judges potentially infringing on constitutional rights, with a suggestion that this is happening incrementally.
  • Another participant expresses confusion about the thread's origin, indicating a possible issue with the visibility of the original post.
  • Several participants question the disappearance of the initial post, leading to speculation about a "ghost thread" or technical issues within the forum.
  • A participant with extensive experience in forum administration suggests that there may be external influences at play, but denies involvement in any manipulation of the thread.
  • There is a request for clarification on whether responses were quoting the original post, indicating a lack of clarity in the ongoing discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus on the effectiveness of courthouse forums or the nature of the thread's issues, with multiple competing views and uncertainties remaining about both the topic and the technical aspects of the discussion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes unresolved questions about the original post's disappearance and the implications of courthouse forums on constitutional rights, with no clear resolution to these issues.

mugaliens
Messages
197
Reaction score
1
I think it's an absolutely outstanding way to leverage our use of the Internet to keep track of what's really going on with respect to the administration of common law.

Please remember these involve your day to day rights, what you can, and you cannot do, and they are being decided on a serious rate as we speak.

Most judges would love for you to continue in your Constitutional and amendent rights.

Sadly, some do not. Some of these judicial "folks" would like to steal your rights, and they actively engage in doing so on a regular, though somewhat incremental basis.

Sorry, this is not political in basis. It's merely in response to the opportunity of http://www.courthouseforum.com/".

That's it.

If you would like more, just be silent and I'll bring a thousand-fold through your political doors.

This is correct. I don't believe in the "biggest stick" approach, except..

It usually wins.

And I (we) have the biggest stick.

That's not why I'm writing you, though, as i am most certainly not anyone who carries any such "stick."

I am simply human. Period, bare none, save for a 47-year stint as a US civilian, 20+ years of that which during which I served as a military officer...

Ok, folks - what's going on? Why did this issue, so totally beyond the bounds of our Constitutional provisions, mandates, requirements, etc, grab my attention?

You know what? I know enough to argue these excerpts endlessly. If you allow these to remain open I will so, endlessly.

On the other hand, this is not the business or even leisure of a forum on physics.

I don't know - close the thread, or entertain contradictions to several court orders (of which I'd love to add my own!)

I would do so in a very straightforward an objective manner, commenserate with a consensus divorce decree dated 2008.

Are you up for this?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What happened to the first post - I didn't start this thread. I was just responding to it.
 
mugaliens said:
What happened to the first post - I didn't start this thread. I was just responding to it.
I have no idea. Did you start this in general discussion?
 
mugaliens said:
What happened to the first post - I didn't start this thread. I was just responding to it.

Ghost thread? I wonder, if I post in it, if the first two posts will disappear?

Edit: first three posts. Evo snuck in seconds before me.
 
Evo said:
I have no idea. Did you start this in general discussion?

Um, no, I didn't. I'm sorry I'm not the OP. I simply thought it was a great response topic, and after I posted, the first post was gone. I'm visiting a bit later, but this is all I see.

With 25 years as forum admin (me), you've either got a "ghost" (someone who likes planting ideas) or there's something else going on, but I am *not* it.

Good luck. - Mugs
 
Were you quoting the original post in your responses, as your answers suggest?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
10K
  • · Replies 161 ·
6
Replies
161
Views
15K