Are electrons and protons equal in attraction?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nitsuj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrons
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of the relationship between electrons and protons within atoms, particularly focusing on concepts of attraction, containment, and the forces at play. Participants explore whether electrons serve as "containers" for the nucleus and how electromagnetic forces influence their interactions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether electrons create "containers of space" for the nucleus, with one suggesting that the strong nuclear force is responsible for holding nucleons together, independent of electrons.
  • There is a discussion about the conditions under which electrons can be removed from atoms, with examples such as heating and the ejection of alpha particles.
  • Participants explore the behavior of alpha particles after ejection, noting that they can be contained using magnetic or electric fields due to their positive charge.
  • One participant suggests that electrons might act as a "box" shielding the nucleus from electromagnetic forces, while another clarifies that both electrons and protons experience forces that can cancel each other out.
  • There is a question about whether the attraction between electrons and protons can be considered a force, with a distinction made between the attraction and the net force resulting from external fields.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the role of electrons in relation to protons and the nature of their interactions. There is no consensus on whether electrons can be accurately described as containers or how to characterize the forces involved.

Contextual Notes

Some statements rely on assumptions about the definitions of forces and interactions, and the discussion does not resolve the complexities of these concepts.

nitsuj
Messages
1,387
Reaction score
98
Do electrons make "containers of space" for the junk inside the atom to exist?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's a pretty vague or ill-defined question. I'm not sure what you mean.

If you mean the electrons in an atom are 'containing' the nucleus, keeping the protons and neutrons from flying apart, then that's not true. The strong nuclear force is doing that.
The nucleons would be held together whether or not the electrons were there.

The electrons, on the other hand, are where they are because of the electrical charge of the nucleus. They form a 'cloud' of charge density surrounding the nucleus, so
there's no real definition of what the radius of the atom is, or what the radius of the nucleus is. But the 'size' of the nucleus (in terms of how far apart the nucleons are from each other and so on)
is about 1/100,000 the 'size' of the atom (in terms of the approximate size of the electron 'cloud'). These two things are largely unrelated; if the nucleus was 1/10 the size or 10x the size, the
electrons would behave almost exactly the same way.
 
nitsuj said:
Do electrons make "containers of space" for the junk inside the atom to exist?
Perhaps your question is related to the entry ''Does an atom mostly consist of empty space?'' in Chapter A6 of my theoretical physics FAQ at http://arnold-neumaier.at/ph...faq.html#touch
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yea that was vague.

How about, do the nuetron and/or proton (or their "components", excluding force ones) ever not have an electron "orbiting" it?
 
nitsuj said:
Yea that was vague.

How about, do the nuetron and/or proton (or their "components", excluding force ones) ever not have an electron "orbiting" it?

Sure. It is relatively easy to remove the electrons from an atom. Simply heating something up enough will do the trick. Although it needs to be at tens of thousands or higher temperature. Also, look at Alpha Particles. They are simply Helium nuclei that have been ejected from a radioative source. They don't have any electrons around them once they are rejected.
 
What happens to them after they're ejected?
 
Last edited:
nitsuj said:
What happens to them after there ejected?

They fly away, and unless they are in space, then they will most likely hit other matter, bounce around a bit, and eventually slow down enough to capture some electrons and turn into a Helium atom.
 
Can they be slowed down and collected without electrons?
 
Last edited:
nitsuj said:
Can they be slowed down and collected?

Sure. Since an alpha particle is made up of positively charged protons and neutral...neutrons...(heh), they are highly positively charged and you can easily contain them in a magnetic/electric field if you know what you are doing.
 
  • #10
So the magenetic field does the same thing as the electron? In the sense of "stoping" it from moving?
 
  • #11
nitsuj said:
So the magenetic field does the same thing as the electron? In the sense of "stoping" it from moving?

What do you mean by doing the same thing as the electrons?
 
  • #12
It seems without an electron they move around a lot, and you said they could be collected in a magenetic field.
 
  • #13
nitsuj said:
It seems without an electron they move around a lot, and you said they could be collected in a magenetic field.

The movement of the alpha particle has nothing to do with electrons. It is simply a result of being ejected from the nucleus of an atom. Since it is a charged particle, an appropriate magnetic field can contain it.

The only thing having electrons does is to give an atom a charge or make it neutral. Most atoms have the same number of electrons as they do protons, making most atoms neutral in charge since the electrons and protons cancel each others charges out. If you add an extra electron, then the atom has a net negative charge, while removing electrons causes and atom to have a net positive charge.

I'm sure it looks like I've said electrons have almost no use, but that is the furthest thing from the truth. The way electrons orbit a nucleus and how they interact with other atoms defines how matter behaves in nearly every way.
 
  • #14
Is it to loose to say electrons make a "container" proctecing the necleus from electromagnetic force. Specificaly from creating the force resulting from an imbalance, which as you said does happen?

Asking it differently, is it the proton that "wants" the electron?
 
Last edited:
  • #15
nitsuj said:
Is it to loose to say electrons make a "container" proctecing the necleus from electromagnetic force. Specificaly from creating the force resulting from an imbalance, which as you said does happen?

Asking it differently, is it the proton that "wants" the electron?

Both are attracted to each other. Using your analogy, you COULD think of the electrons as acting like a "box" that shields the positive electric force...but it's not really correct.

What actually happens is that BOTH the electrons and the protons feel forces from electromagnetic sources, but since they have OPPOSITE reactions to the force, they cancel each other out.
 
  • #16
Ah I see, thanks for letting setting me straight on that. :) One last thing, is the "Canceling out" a force too, in that the electron(s) and neclues attact each other.
 
Last edited:
  • #17
nitsuj said:
Ah I see, thanks for letting setting me straight on that. :) One last thing, is the "Canceling out" a force too, in that the electron(s) and neclues attact each other.

The electrons are attracted to the protons in the nucleus. When you introduce an external magnetic or electric field, both the protons and electrons experience the same magnitude of force from it, but in opposite directions. Since you have one part of the atom being pulled and the other part being pushed the NET force on the atom is zero. The canceling out is merely that, not a force in and of itself.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K