Are Extra Dimensions Just Mathematical Mumbo Jumbo?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the nature of dimensions, particularly the perception of three spatial dimensions and the concept of additional dimensions. Participants argue that while humans experience the universe in three dimensions—length, width, and depth—these dimensions are not separate entities but rather interdependent measurements within a volume. There is skepticism about the existence of extra dimensions, with some viewing them as mathematical constructs rather than physical realities. The conversation touches on how dimensions are often used as tools to describe physical phenomena, yet they can blur the distinctions between empty space and space containing mass. The complexity of quantum physics and theories like string theory are acknowledged, but there is a call for clearer explanations that bridge the gap between mathematical abstraction and intuitive understanding. Ultimately, the dialogue highlights the challenges of defining dimensions and the potential confusion arising from their usage in both physics and everyday language.
  • #51
Could that be what the big bang was? just a huge out burst of madder from the other end of a black hole? wonder if there would be a way to prove it? well i do know the people don't know if the big bang was spontaineus or if it slowly grew from one point in orgin :/ if you beg to difer please place a like to some info
 

Similar threads

Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top