Are Geometric Progressions Always Less Than or Equal to Arithmetic Progressions?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dustinsfl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometric
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion confirms that geometric progressions (GP) are not always less than or equal to arithmetic progressions (AP). Specifically, the example provided illustrates that the sum of the arithmetic progression \(1, 3, 5\) equals 9, while the sum of the geometric progression \(2, 4, 8\) equals 14, demonstrating that AP can exceed GP. The conversation also touches on the relationship between arithmetic and geometric means, reinforcing the established mathematical principle that the arithmetic mean is greater than or equal to the geometric mean.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of arithmetic and geometric progressions
  • Familiarity with the concepts of arithmetic mean and geometric mean
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical inequalities
  • Ability to perform summation of sequences
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of arithmetic and geometric means in depth
  • Explore the implications of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality
  • Investigate the conditions under which GP and AP can be compared
  • Learn about convergence in sequences and series
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, students studying sequences and series, and anyone interested in the properties of mathematical inequalities.

Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
Is it true that geometric progressions are \leq arithmetic?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Doesn't seem a far shot. We know that arithmetic mean is greater or equal than geometric mean, perhaps applying that you could get to your result. Are we assuming finiteness or not?
 
dwsmith said:
Is it true that geometric progressions are \leq arithmetic?

Hi dwsmith, :)

Can you please clarify your question a bit more. Do you mean the inequality of arithmetic and geometric means ?

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.
 
I am wondering if GP $\leq$ AP
 
dwsmith said:
I am wondering if GP $\leq$ AP

So your question seems to be whether the sum of any arithmetic progression is greater than or equal to the sum of any geometric progression. That is not the case. For example, \(1,\,3,\,5\) is an arithmetic progression and \(2,\,4,\,8\) is a geometric progression. But, \(1+3+5=9\mbox{ and }2+4+8=14\)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
845
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K