Are Humans Considered Animals in the Kingdom Animalia?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dremmer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Animals
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on whether humans are classified as animals within the Kingdom Animalia, exploring both scientific classifications and everyday perceptions. It touches on biological definitions, characteristics of animals, and the implications of anthropocentrism.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that humans are included in the Kingdom Animalia and conform to the biological definitions of animals.
  • Others highlight that while scientific classifications may categorize all non-plant life as animals, everyday language often does not reflect this view.
  • One participant emphasizes that the classification of living organisms is complex and includes groups that are neither animals nor plants.
  • Another participant outlines the characteristics of metazoa, arguing that humans meet all criteria for being classified as animals.
  • Some participants express a view that humans often consider themselves superior to other animals, despite being biologically classified as animals.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that humans are biologically classified as animals, but there is disagreement regarding the implications of this classification and how it is perceived in everyday language.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects varying definitions and classifications of living organisms, highlighting the complexity and potential misconceptions surrounding the categorization of humans within the animal kingdom.

Dremmer
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
We're in the Kingdom Animalia, but are we animals? Or does the Animalia Kingdom include humans and animals?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
http://kids.discovery.com/tell-me/animals/mammals/are-humans-considered-animals
 
Scientific? Sure, see above
Everyday language? Usually not.

Oh, and to avoid a common misconception:
discovery.com said:
Scientists describe virtually everything that is alive as animal or plant. So, if you're not a plant then you are an animal!
This is wrong. There are multiple ways to classify all living species, but all involve more groups: There are species which are neither animals nor plants. See the graphs and lists at wikipedia for an introduction.
 
animals are "metazoa": muilticellular eukaryote creatures with connective tissues. Bacteria and archea are not animals as they are single-celled. Furthermore, animals must be heterotrophic, which means they don't use carbon as part of their digestion process (this excludes plants). Fungi are also heterotrophic, but there's a further distinguishing feature of metazoa: they don't have cell walls. Finally, a cherry on top, animals are mobile: they can move around. I'm not sure how sponges fit into this, so maybe they're an exception, but their look-alike ancestors are also one of the first animals.

Humans conform to all of the classifications of metazoa, so yes, they are animals.
 
Dunno about you, Dremmer, but I sure am. And a mammal, and even a primate at that. Woop woop!
 
just look at basic characterstics common to members of kingdom Animalia. We satisfy all of them...
 
Humans are quite anthropocentric, they usually consider themselves as a superior being, but we're biologically animals and should be considered animals at all biological circumstances.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K