Are hydraulics the strongest way to move a robot's legs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheCurious
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hydraulics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effectiveness of hydraulics versus other methods, such as electric cylinders and pneumatic systems, for moving a robot's legs, particularly in the context of large robotic designs. Participants explore various mechanisms and their suitability for mimicking muscle movement, efficiency, load capacity, and speed.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that hydraulics may be the most efficient method for moving robotic legs due to leverage advantages.
  • Others argue that electric motors, as used in ABB robotics, can support significant loads and may be more suitable for certain applications.
  • One participant mentions the potential for using smaller devices depending on the specific application and load requirements, emphasizing programming for movement rather than solely relying on hydraulic systems.
  • A suggestion is made for using electrical linear actuators, which utilize a power screw to drive the piston.
  • Concerns are raised about the cost and maintenance of hydraulic systems, with a preference expressed for electrical systems due to their practicality and speed considerations.
  • Another participant highlights the bounce factor in pneumatic systems, suggesting that hydraulics may provide more stability due to the incompressibility of fluids.
  • Artificial muscles, which are still in development, are mentioned as a potential alternative for achieving muscle-like movement in robots.
  • One participant proposes the use of a liquid that changes viscosity with an electric current as an innovative approach for robotic movement.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions on the best method for moving robotic legs, with no consensus reached. Various viewpoints on the advantages and disadvantages of hydraulics, electric systems, and pneumatics are presented, indicating ongoing debate and exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations such as the need for cost considerations, maintenance requirements, and the specific application of the robotic system, which may influence the choice of actuation method.

TheCurious
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
hi, in the hypothetical, if you had a robot with a large leg (like a mech), would hydraulics be the only way to move the leg like muscles do? what about electric cylinders? Thank you.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
ABB robotics makes robotic arms controlled by electric motors. Quickly scanning their website, I saw that their largest robotic arm can support about 500kg.

Exavators on constructon sites can support weights many times that and they use hydraulics.
 
As far as I know, from an efficiency and leverage standpoint it's better to use hydraulics. However in the case of a robot I would fancy using other smaller devices depending on what it is to be used for and how much load it has to lift. I don't know about moving like muscles do, but I imagine much of that can done by programming specific behaviors even if the device you use moves much too abruptly or in an inhuman fashion.
 
Would a electrical linear actuator help in your case? It uses a power screw to drive the piston.
 
To TheCurious;

Using hydraulic to run the robotic legs isn't a solution. Hydraulic need reservoir, compressor, etc... will be very costly for components and also fluid maintenance. Hydraulic robot normally used for industrial due to very heavy loads. My personal experience to run a robot definitely will be electrical. Like what you mention, "electrical cylinder". The limitation of electrical cylinder its hardly carry heavy loads.

Another consideration is the speed. You must clearly understand the speed vs torque graph. If you really want to consider hydualic, I am very sure your robot will be extremely slow.

Because of this reason, pneumatic is a best solution. For me, I will determine the weight of the robot without load (stability) and with load handling and pre-determine whether run by electrical or pneumatic. Calculation must be carry out from its mechanism to respect to the motor and to another parts such as the stress & strain calculation of the cylinders.
 
Last edited:
boston dynamics (developers of big dog etc www.bostondynamics.com) use hydraluic actuators in their larger designs.
 
I'm always a bit leery about pneumatics for heavy applications because of the 'bounce' factor resultant of the air being able to be compressed within the cylinder. You don't have that problem with hydraulics because of the fluid being essentially incompressible. There are some very fast-acting systems available, including proportional solenoid valves.
If this is strictly theoretical, or on an unlimited budget, you can also investigate artificial muscles that are in development. So far, they're fairly small and very expensive, but the potential looks very good.
 
This is just a suggestion, but I know that modern robotics often uses a liquid which changes it viscosity when a current passes through it (can't remember the name for that fluid) to act as muscles for the robots, I think that would be the ideal option in this case as this is a liquid, so it is incompressible, and there is a relationship between its viscosity to the current applied to it for accurate movements. And all you need is the liquid and a battery and a regulator to make it work. Hope this helps.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K