Are my goals realistic if I pursue a PhD at a mid/low rank school?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the realism of pursuing a PhD in pure mathematics at a mid to low-ranked institution, with a focus on potential career paths in teaching and research. Participants explore the job market for math PhDs, the importance of mentorship, and the qualifications needed for teaching positions, particularly at community colleges and lower-tier schools.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express concerns that the goal of securing a teaching or research position may be unrealistic due to the competitive job market, even for candidates from lower-ranked schools.
  • Others suggest that attending a second-tier school may still allow for part-time teaching opportunities at community colleges, provided certain qualifications are met.
  • There is a discussion about the significance of mentorship over the prestige of the institution, with some arguing that a well-known mentor can enhance career prospects regardless of school ranking.
  • Participants question how to assess the reputation of professors at lower-ranked schools, discussing metrics such as publication records and the success of their former students.
  • Concerns are raised about the feasibility of adjunct positions, which may offer low pay and limited job security, as well as the challenges of transitioning to high school teaching with a PhD.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally do not reach a consensus on the realism of the original poster's goals, with some expressing skepticism about job prospects while others believe opportunities may still exist under certain conditions.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying definitions of "realistic" goals, differing perceptions of job market saturation, and the lack of specific data on employment outcomes for graduates from mid to low-ranked programs.

lus1450
Messages
40
Reaction score
1
I'll be applying to PhD programs in pure math this fall. However, my profile isn't that outstanding, so I'll most likely being going to a "mid" to "low" rank (as determined by US News Grad Rankings, for what it's worth). Ultimately, I'd want to do research as well as teach lower/upper division math classes. That being said, I know how overfilled the market is with math PhDs, so even those from top 10 schools don't have much of a chance getting tenure, at least, not super fast. That being said, I'm totally okay with being able to either just teach lower/upper division classes with no research, or doing research and teaching at a "No Name" or "low rank" school. I just love the idea of always learning new mathematics and contributing to it, no matter how small or insignificant it may end up compared to others', and I don't think it's absolutely necessary to go to a top 10 school to do that. I could be wrong though. So given my last few statements about be content with ending up somewhere that's not necessarily top rank, are my goals for teaching/research realistic?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the target (as opposed to the plan) is somewhat unrealistic. There are relatively few career-track jobs out there of the sort you describe, and even "low rank" schools get some highly qualified candidates.
 
Community colleges in our area require an MS in the subject and at least 20 graduate credit hours in order to be qualified to teach 1st and 2nd year college math like Calculus I, II, III. So I think its possible that going to a second tier math school you'll be able to find work at least part-time at a local community college at some point.
 
Last edited:
Keep in mind also that it is not always about the name of the school, but who your mentor is. You can find some well known people in some not so well known places. Having your name associated with somebody well known in a particular field is very beneficial.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
I think the target (as opposed to the plan) is somewhat unrealistic. There are relatively few career-track jobs out there of the sort you describe, and even "low rank" schools get some highly qualified candidates.

Thanks for the reply. I'm from California, so I'm not sure if you're familiar with California State system. Even though none of them are "ranked" I do see that there quite a few professors from top schools and quite a few from mid rank schools. So even schools like that seem some what unrealistic if I want to teach there?
 
dkotschessaa said:
Keep in mind also that it is not always about the name of the school, but who your mentor is. You can find some well known people in some not so well known places. Having your name associated with somebody well known in a particular field is very beneficial.

Thanks for the reply. To expand on this, what is a good metric to finding a "well known" professor at these schools? I've recently been searching their names through the arXiv and the Genealogy Project, but I'm not sure if that tells me anything since having papers uploaded there doesn't mean they're being cited. Though, I think I'm getting some decent information by looking up how many students they had and where they ended up, but I'm not sure how complete the list is on Genealogy.
 
Zaculus said:
Thanks for the reply. To expand on this, what is a good metric to finding a "well known" professor at these schools? I've recently been searching their names through the arXiv and the Genealogy Project, but I'm not sure if that tells me anything since having papers uploaded there doesn't mean they're being cited. Though, I think I'm getting some decent information by looking up how many students they had and where they ended up, but I'm not sure how complete the list is on Genealogy.

I'm not exactly sure either, since I found this type of information out after I was already at the school for awhile. I think the number of publications, students, and where those students are working are pretty good indicators.

-Dave K
 
Zaculus said:
So given my last few statements about be content with ending up somewhere that's not necessarily top rank, are my goals for teaching/research realistic?

It depends. Would you be happy if you do something else for a day job, but teach the occasional math class at a small college for low pay? Getting an adjunct job is pretty easy, but the pay is awful (2k-3k for a 4 credit course), getting full time positions is very difficult.

Even high school teaching is tricky- with a phd you start at a higher pay bracket, so you are asking a school to take a chance on someone who will get paid more despite no experience teaching people in the age group.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K