Are Null Points Present Between Galaxies on a Collision Course?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Galaxies Points
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion confirms the existence of Lagrange points between gravitationally bound galaxies, specifically between the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies, based on Newtonian mechanics. The traditional five Lagrange points apply as a reasonable approximation for binary galaxy systems, although the complexities of multi-body systems introduce additional challenges. The discussion emphasizes that while Lagrange points 2-5 rely on circular orbits, Lagrange point 1 may exist as an extended region of low gravitational potential due to the galaxies' collision course. The nuances of these gravitational interactions highlight the limitations of classical Lagrangian calculations in non-orbital scenarios.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newtonian mechanics and the two-body problem
  • Familiarity with Lagrange points and their mathematical foundations
  • Knowledge of gravitational interactions in astrophysics
  • Basic concepts of galaxy dynamics and collision courses
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical derivation of Lagrange points in multi-body systems
  • Explore the dynamics of galaxy collisions and their gravitational effects
  • Study the implications of extended regions of low gravitational potential
  • Investigate current astrophysical models of binary galaxy systems
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students studying gravitational dynamics, particularly those interested in galaxy interactions and Lagrangian mechanics.

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
551
Are there large scale lagrange points between gravitationaly bound galaxies?
ie a small galaxy that orbits a larger one, or even points where gravity is null
between near large bodies
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
Lagrange's calculation is based on very general (but also very specialized) mathematics, in particular the Newtonian two body problem. So yes, there should be the same old 5 lagrangian points for the Milky Way and the Andromeda galaxy, since they are a reasonably good approximation to a two body system. Similarly for any other more or less isolated binary galaxies. Also true at even larger scales if you can find binary galaxy clusters or even bound binary superclusters. (I'm not aware of any, but that doesn't mean they don't exist.) Probably even more similar points exist in three and more body systems, but this is much more complex mathematics and I am not aware of any general results.
Jim
 
Lagrange points rely on two assumptions. The first is that the bodies are point particles or spherical, since the external gravitational field of a spherical object is the same as the field or a point particle of the same mass. The second is that the objects are in orbit around a common centre of mass.

The first probably dosn't apply to these galaxies, and the second doesn't either. They are on a collision course rather than an orbit. If you look at the main image inhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange_points" link you will see that Lagrange points 2-5 really on the fact that the bodies are in circular motion around the common centre of mass. This dosn't apply in this case. Lagrange point 1 may exist, however since the galaxies are not points or spheres it probably will not be a point be more of an extended region of low potential, rather than a definite trough.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K