Are orthonormal eigenbases unique?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bipolarity
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

An operator T: V → V on a finite-dimensional inner product space that is orthogonally diagonalizable guarantees the existence of an orthonormal eigenbasis for V. However, this eigenbasis is not unique due to the freedom of scaling eigenvectors and the ability to extend nonparallel vectors into distinct orthonormal bases. In eigenspaces of dimension greater than one, multiple orthonormal bases can be formed, leading to the conclusion that there are 2^n distinct orthonormal eigenbases, even when each eigenspace is one-dimensional. The discussion highlights the implications of complex vector spaces, where infinite variations arise from multiplying vectors by e^{iθ}.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of finite-dimensional inner product spaces
  • Knowledge of orthogonal diagonalization
  • Familiarity with eigenspaces and eigenvalues
  • Basic concepts of vector normalization in complex fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of orthogonal diagonalization in linear algebra
  • Explore Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization process
  • Learn about the implications of complex eigenvalues in eigenvalue problems
  • Investigate the uniqueness of eigenbases in various dimensional spaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, linear algebra students, and engineers dealing with eigenvalue problems will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the nuances of orthonormal eigenbases and their applications in various fields.

Bipolarity
Messages
773
Reaction score
2
Suppose you have an operator ## T: V → V ## on a finite-dimensional inner product space, and suppose it is orthogonally diagonalizable. Then there exists an orthonormal eigenbasis for V. Is this eigenbasis unique?

Obviously, in the case of simple diagonalization, the basis is not unique since scaling (by nonzero) any vector in an eigenbasis yields a valid eigenbasis.

Likewise, an orthonormal basis for a space of at least dimension 2 is not unique, since we can take any two nonparallel vectors in the space and extend each to its own orthonormal basis through Gram-Schmidt. The two bases must be distinct.

But what about an orthonormal eigenbasis? Is this set unique? My guess is that it is, but I need to know for sure so I can think about which direction I want to steer my proof.

Thanks!

BiP
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Psst...consider the identity map and two distinct orthonormal bases for V.

Edit: There are plenty of other examples too. This one is just the easiest.
 
Last edited:
You can decompose your vector space V uniquely into
V = \bigoplus_{\lambda} V_{\lambda}
where V_{\lambda} is the eigenspace of eigenvalue \lambda. Inside of each eigenspace if the dimension is not equal to 1 you have a lot of freedom as to what basis you pick (as jgens example gives). Even if each eigenspace is 1 dimensional, you still have two unit vectors from each eigenspace that you can pick, so there are still 2n orthornomal eigenbases.
 
Office_Shredder said:
Even if each eigenspace is 1 dimensional, you still have two unit vectors from each eigenspace that you can pick, so there are still 2n orthornomal eigenbases.

Unless I'm missing the point completely, I suppose you mean vectors V and -V?

If you count those as "different" vectors, then if V is complex there are infinite number of vectors to pick from. You can multiply the vector by ##e^{i\theta}## for any ##\theta##.

FWIW in practical engineering eigenvalue problems, you often make a further arbitrary choice about normalization (e.g. make the element of the vector with the maximum modulus real and positive) to nail down those arbitrary but annoying differences, when comparing results from slightly different eigensolutions.
 
AlephZero said:
Unless I'm missing the point completely, I suppose you mean vectors V and -V?

If you count those as "different" vectors, then if V is complex there are infinite number of vectors to pick from. You can multiply the vector by ##e^{i\theta}## for any ##\theta##.

Oh yeah I forgot sometimes the field isn't \mathbb{R} :redface:
 
Ahh I forgot that scaling a vector by a number on the unit disk in the complex plane (or -1 if the field is real)) preserves normalization of the vector.

Thank you guys!

BiP
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K