Are Rational Numbers Truly Dense in the Real Number System?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aaaa202
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
Rational numbers are indeed dense in the real number system, meaning every real number is a limit point of rational numbers. This property implies that within any interval, there exist both rational and irrational numbers. The discussion highlights the relationship between the density of rationals and the ability to construct sequences of rational numbers converging to any real number. It suggests that defining intervals around a real number can demonstrate this density without complex constructions. Overall, the two statements about density and the presence of rationals in intervals are effectively equivalent.
aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
I have in my book the statement: Every interval contains both rational and irrational numbers. Now, I have heard somewhere that the rationals are dense in the real numbers, which I assumed was the property stated above, but then it turns out that it means that all real numbers are limit points of the rationals. Are the two statements equivalent.
My guess is yes: For since every interval has rational numbers we can construct at sequence of intersections about any given real number a which by completeness should converge to a. But then choosing the sequence of rational numbers that are in the successive intersections we get a sequence of rationals with limit point a. But my problem is: Do we know that we can always construct a sequence of intersections around any real number?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aaaa202 said:
I have in my book the statement: Every interval contains both rational and irrational numbers. Now, I have heard somewhere that the rationals are dense in the real numbers, which I assumed was the property stated above, but then it turns out that it means that all real numbers are limit points of the rationals. Are the two statements equivalent.
My guess is yes: For since every interval has rational numbers we can construct at sequence of intersections about any given real number a which by completeness should converge to a. But then choosing the sequence of rational numbers that are in the successive intersections we get a sequence of rationals with limit point a. But my problem is: Do we know that we can always construct a sequence of intersections around any real number?

Just define the nth interval to be (a-1/n,a+1/n). There's not much need to 'construct' anything.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 85 ·
3
Replies
85
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K