Are RF Photons Present in NMR Spectroscopy?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Frank Peters
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Existence Photons Rf
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the presence of RF photons in NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance) spectroscopy, exploring whether RF energy produced during NMR can be considered as actual photons. Participants examine the nature of NMR, its resonance effects, and the implications for understanding RF energy at lower frequencies.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that RF energy being composed of photons lacks experimental evidence due to the long wavelengths of RF waves, questioning whether NMR produces RF photons.
  • Others assert that NMR produces RF energy from the decay of excited nuclear spin states, suggesting this could be seen as the production of RF photons.
  • One participant compares NMR to an LC circuit, suggesting that the nuclei do not radiate but respond to an RF pulse, indicating a resonance effect rather than photon emission.
  • Another participant points out that while NMR is a resonance effect, it also involves quantum mechanics, as the frequency of radiation corresponds to the energy difference between nuclear spin states.
  • Some participants reference the 21 cm Hydrogen line as an example of RF phenomena, noting that it arises from electron transitions, which differ from NMR processes.
  • There is a discussion about the possibility of finding nuclear or atomic transitions that correspond to even lower radio frequencies than those typically observed in NMR.
  • One participant emphasizes that NMR involves breaking the degeneracy of spin states in a magnetic field and that the RF pulse can induce transitions between these states, indicating a more complex interaction than mere resonance.
  • Another participant mentions that ultra-low field NMR can operate at much lower frequencies (kHz), but with reduced signal strength due to lower polarization.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether NMR can be considered an experimental verification of RF photons. Some support the idea that NMR involves quantum effects, while others maintain that it primarily represents a classical resonance phenomenon. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in understanding the basic operations of NMR setups and the implications of different magnetic field strengths on the observed frequencies. There is also a mention of the dependence of frequency observations on the reference frame.

Frank Peters
Messages
28
Reaction score
2
Some will claim that RF energy being composed of photons can only be accepted on faith because there is no experimental evidence and there probably will be no experimental evidence due to the comparatively long wavelenghts of RF waves.

But the technique of NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance) spectroscopy produces RF energy from the decay of excited nuclear spin states. Is this not the actual production of RF photons?

NMR frequncies can be as low as 70-100 megahertz and thus the NMR apparatus gives experimental evidence for RF photons at this relatively low frequency range.

Is this a correct assessment?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Frank Peters said:
Some will claim that RF energy being composed of photons can only be accepted on faith because there is no experimental evidence and there probably will be no experimental evidence due to the comparatively long wavelenghts of RF waves.

But the technique of NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance) spectroscopy produces RF energy from the decay of excited nuclear spin states. Is this not the actual production of RF photons?

NMR frequncies can be as low as 70-100 megahertz and thus the NMR apparatus gives experimental evidence for RF photons at this relatively low frequency range.

Is this a correct assessment?
As far as I can see, NMR is just a resonance effect. The nuclei are not radiating, they just respond to a pulse of field and then continue to oscillate for a period of time. It is outwardly the same as an LC circuit. The size of the "experiment" is small compared to the wavelength, so we are probably dealing with induction fields for the most part, rather than radiation of photons by the nuclei.
 
So what? It is in the RF-range, and photons are necessary to understand the observations of the line.
 
tech99 said:
As far as I can see, NMR is just a resonance effect.

So you are saying that NMR is not a quantum effect, even though the frequency of the radiation is equal to the difference between the nuclear spin states according to E = hv.

As has been mentioned, the maser is a good example of RF photons but the frequency of a maser is an order of magnitude higher than that of NMR. I wonder if it is possible to find quantum transitions that coorespond to even lower frequencies.
 
tech99 said:
As far as I can see, NMR is just a resonance effect. The nuclei are not radiating, they just respond to a pulse of field and then continue to oscillate for a period of time. It is outwardly the same as an LC circuit. The size of the "experiment" is small compared to the wavelength, so we are probably dealing with induction fields for the most part, rather than radiation of photons by the nuclei.

This is incorrect.

The MACROSCOPIC effect, or the bulk magnetization, may be describe via classical effect, but the MICROSCOPIC effect can't. For example, how do you account for the population of spins in each state once the degeneracy has been removed in a magnetic field? This population fraction determines the strength of the signal that you get at a particular temperature.

The fact that NMR uses the property of the splitting of such spin states (something that is absent in classical description) clearly indicates that, at the most fundamental level, NMR is a quantum effect.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb
Thank you.
 
  • #10
ZapperZ said:
at the most fundamental level, NMR is a quantum effect.
Zz.

That seems to answer my original question. We can look upon NMR spectroscopy as being an experimental verification for the existence of RF photons.

Does science know of any nuclear/atomic/molecular transitions that would correspond to even lower radio frequncies? As I mentioned, NMR transitions usually correspond to frequencies around 75-100 MHz.
 
  • #11
Frank Peters said:
That seems to answer my original question. We can look upon NMR spectroscopy as being an experimental verification for the existence of RF photons.

Does science know of any nuclear/atomic/molecular transitions that would correspond to even lower radio frequncies? As I mentioned, NMR transitions usually correspond to frequencies around 75-100 MHz.
Apologies if I am mistaken in this, but I understood that the resonant structure - the nucleus - is given an RF pulse so it rings. We then measure that frequency. We are not using the pulse to pump the energy of the nucleus up somehow so we observe a transition. That is why I suggested that the nucleus behaves like an LC circuit, a passive device.
 
  • #12
tech99 said:
Apologies if I am mistaken in this, but I understood that the resonant structure - the nucleus - is given an RF pulse so it rings. We then measure that frequency. We are not using the pulse to pump the energy of the nucleus up somehow so we observe a transition. That is why I suggested that the nucleus behaves like an LC circuit, a passive device.

I don't understand this, and I bet you don't quite understand some of the basic operations of an NMR setup.

1. The material is put in a STATIC magnetic field. This then breaks the degeneracy of the magnetic splitting.

2. An ADDITIONAL pulse can then be sent to the material. This pulse may induced a number of things, such as a 90-degree flip of the bulk magnetization (a spin-lattice relaxation process) or a 180-degree flip (a spin-spin relaxation process).

Both of those processes involve changing the population of higher and lower spin states for a brief period of time. So you are, in essence, "pumping" the nucleus into an excited "spin" state.

Zz.
 
  • #13
Frank Peters said:
Does science know of any nuclear/atomic/molecular transitions that would correspond to even lower radio frequncies? As I mentioned, NMR transitions usually correspond to frequencies around 75-100 MHz.
You could do NMR with weaker magnetic fields.
Where is the point? 100 MHz in one reference frame is 1 Hz in another.
 
  • #14
tech99 said:
Apologies if I am mistaken in this, but I understood that the resonant structure - the nucleus - is given an RF pulse so it rings. We then measure that frequency. We are not using the pulse to pump the energy of the nucleus up somehow so we observe a transition. That is why I suggested that the nucleus behaves like an LC circuit, a passive device.

It really only depends on the field you are using. In ultra-low field NMR (which can be done in the Earth's background field) the frequencies involved are much lower (kHz), but then the signal is lower since the degree of polarization is much lower.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K